Skip to content

Conversation

est31
Copy link
Member

@est31 est31 commented May 23, 2017

Stabilisation PR for non capturing closure to fn coercion.

closes #39817

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #42165) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@est31 est31 force-pushed the closure-to-fn-coercion branch from 6c299ba to 8b4a590 Compare May 23, 2017 12:59
@arielb1 arielb1 added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. S-waiting-on-team Status: Awaiting decision from the relevant subteam (see the T-<team> label). T-lang Relevant to the language team and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 23, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 25, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #41145) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@est31 est31 force-pushed the closure-to-fn-coercion branch from 8b4a590 to 87950b7 Compare May 25, 2017 09:58
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

all the other criteria needed for stabilisation are met.

Docs criteria is met.

@est31
Copy link
Member Author

est31 commented May 26, 2017

As agreed to on IRC, asking for early review (before the remaining 7 days of FCP are over) due to the branch date of beta in 7 days, otherwise the feature might not make it into 1.19. We can always back out later.

r? @aturon

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned aturon and unassigned pnkfelix May 26, 2017
@aturon
Copy link
Contributor

aturon commented May 27, 2017

Let's go ahead and get this into the queue.

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 27, 2017

📌 Commit 87950b7 has been approved by aturon

@shepmaster shepmaster added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-team Status: Awaiting decision from the relevant subteam (see the T-<team> label). labels May 27, 2017
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request May 27, 2017
Stabilize non capturing closure to fn coercion

Stabilisation PR for non capturing closure to fn coercion.

closes rust-lang#39817
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request May 27, 2017
Stabilize non capturing closure to fn coercion

Stabilisation PR for non capturing closure to fn coercion.

closes rust-lang#39817
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2017
Rollup of 10 pull requests

- Successful merges: #42103, #42137, #42162, #42167, #42175, #42207, #42217, #42246, #42249, #42251
- Failed merges:
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 27, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 87950b7 with merge 5d2512e...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2017
Stabilize non capturing closure to fn coercion

Stabilisation PR for non capturing closure to fn coercion.

closes #39817
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 28, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: aturon
Pushing 5d2512e to master...

@est31
Copy link
Member Author

est31 commented May 28, 2017

It got merged yeey!

I'm not sure though why the PR doesn't get shown as "merged" by this. Github bug?

@est31 est31 closed this May 28, 2017
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

GH seems to recognize that it is merged afterwards though; I can't reopen -- "commits are already merged"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-lang Relevant to the language team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking issue for RFC 1558: Allow coercing non-capturing closures to function pointers
9 participants