Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be changed to "[write!]" instead of [write_macro] while we're here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not!

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Next, I think about removing the actual compatibility with the old url macro syntax. If people have opinion?

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

Next, I think about removing the actual compatibility with the old url macro syntax. If people have opinion?

we should leave it in for a little while

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Ok. So I guess this is ready to get merged?

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@steveklabnik: ping

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 30, 2016

📌 Commit f6ab636 has been approved by steveklabnik

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2016
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2016
Rollup of 13 pull requests

- Successful merges: #36529, #36535, #36576, #36623, #36711, #36750, #36810, #36829, #36833, #36841, #36842, #36851, #36860
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit f6ab636 into rust-lang:master Sep 30, 2016
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the macro_url branch October 1, 2016 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants