Skip to content

Conversation

matthew-piziak and others added 16 commits August 26, 2016 11:54
PR rust-lang#35695 for `Range` was approved, so it seems that this side-effect-free style is preferred for Range* examples. This PR performs the same translation for `RangeFrom` and `RangeInclusive`. It also removes what looks to be an erroneously commented line for `#![feature(step_by)]`, and an unnecessary primitive-type annotation in `0u8..`.

add `fn main` wrappers to enable Rust Playground "Run" button
These are exactly equivalent to PR rust-lang#35809, with one caveat: I do not believe there is a non-bitwise binary "xor" operator in Rust, so here it's expressed as (a || b) && !(a && b).

r? @GuillaumeGomez

improved documentation a la PR rust-lang#35993
@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2016

📌 Commit 647d469 has been approved by jonathandturner

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 647d469 with merge 7ab82e9...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2016

💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-opt

fanzier and others added 2 commits August 31, 2016 13:50
…ng#36057. Adding expanded notes/context for what trait a parameter shadows as part of E0194 error messages.
Jonathan Turner added 4 commits August 31, 2016 06:28
…tln-remaining, r=GuillaumeGomez

accumulate vector and assert for RangeFrom and RangeInclusive examples

PR rust-lang#35695 for `Range` was merged, so it seems that this side-effect-free style is preferred for Range* examples. This PR performs the same translation for `RangeFrom` and `RangeInclusive`. It also removes what looks to be an erroneously commented line for `#![feature(step_by)]`, and an unnecessary primitive-type annotation in `0u8..`.
… r=GuillaumeGomez

add evocative examples for `BitOr` and `BitXor`

These are exactly equivalent to PR rust-lang#35809, with one caveat: I do not believe there is a non-bitwise binary XOR operator in Rust, so here it's expressed as `(a || b) && !(a && b)`.

Alternative decompositions are `(a && !b) || (!a && b)` and `(a || b) && (!a || !b)`.  Let me know if you think one of those would be clearer.

r? @GuillaumeGomez
…andturner

Update compiler error E0076 to use new error format

Fixes rust-lang#35221 part of rust-lang#35233

r? @jonathandturner
Jonathan Turner added 12 commits August 31, 2016 06:28
…lexcrichton

Implement `Debug` for `std::path::{Components,Iter}`.

None
rustbook chapters/sections should be an ordered list.
doc: make TcpListener example more simple
Add test for rust-lang#14875

You can check this out in the playground https://is.gd/oVKC2T . It will fail on stable, but pass on nightly as @nagisa suggested on the issue.

Fixes rust-lang#14875
update E0265 to new format

Fixes rust-lang#35309 as part of rust-lang#35233.
I've describe partially bonus achieve in rust-lang#35309

r? @jonathandturner
…thandturner

Bonus format for E0194

Bonus fix for rust-lang#35280. Part of rust-lang#35233. Fixes rust-lang#36057. Adding expanded notes/context for what trait a parameter shadows as part of E0194 error messages.

Errors for E0194 now look like this:

```
$> ./build/x86_64-apple-darwin/stage1/bin/rustc src/test/compile-fail/E0194.rs
error[E0194]: type parameter `T` shadows another type parameter of the same name
  --> src/test/compile-fail/E0194.rs:13:26
   |
11 | trait Foo<T> { //~ NOTE first `T` declared here
   |           - first `T` declared here
12 |     fn do_something(&self) -> T;
13 |     fn do_something_else<T: Clone>(&self, bar: T);
   |                          ^ shadows another type parameter

error: aborting due to previous error
```

r? @jonathandturner
Fix typo in PartialOrd docs

The inline code was formatted incorrectly because of the backtick.
@sophiajt sophiajt closed this Aug 31, 2016
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.