Skip to content

Add diverging functions -> ! to syntax index #29435

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2015
Merged

Add diverging functions -> ! to syntax index #29435

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2015

Conversation

deej-io
Copy link
Contributor

@deej-io deej-io commented Oct 28, 2015

I put the reference under the function return operator -> rather than near the suggested ! operators as I thought it was more relevant there.

Resolves #29431

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Manishearth (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 28, 2015

📌 Commit 90b776e has been approved by Manishearth

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2015
…=Manishearth

I put the reference under the function return operator `->` rather than near the suggested `!` operators as I thought it was more relevant there.

Resolves rust-lang#29431
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 90b776e into rust-lang:master Oct 29, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants