Skip to content

Conversation

eddyb
Copy link
Member

@eddyb eddyb commented Sep 23, 2015

While this is technically a [breaking-change], there is no excuse for touching HEAP.
r? @pnkfelix

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Contributor

@eddyb travis says you need to placate the pretty tests in some way.

cx.tcx.sess.span_bug(
self.span,
&format!("operator should have been handled elsewhere {:?}", op));
&format!("derefence should have been handled elsewhere {:?}", op));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo: "derefence" should be "dereference" (or "deref" perhaps; its just a bug msg...)

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Contributor

cc #22181

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Contributor

@eddyb okay this looks fine to me (as in, r=me once travis is happy). Looks like the only issue is that your pretty printing code is inserting an extra set of { ... }'s, right?

@eddyb eddyb force-pushed the no-place-for-an-old-box branch from a1b7132 to f293ea2 Compare September 24, 2015 15:00
@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Sep 24, 2015

@bors r=pnkfelix

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 24, 2015

📌 Commit f293ea2 has been approved by pnkfelix

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 24, 2015

⌛ Testing commit f293ea2 with merge 5ca60d9...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2015
While this is technically a [breaking-change], there is no excuse for touching `HEAP`.
r? @pnkfelix
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 24, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-nopt-t

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: retry

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:04 PM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - auto-mac-64-nopt-t
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-mac-64-nopt-t/builds/6572


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28608 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 24, 2015

@bors bors merged commit f293ea2 into rust-lang:master Sep 25, 2015
@eddyb eddyb deleted the no-place-for-an-old-box branch September 25, 2015 09:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants