Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reference grammar: remove procedure_type #28205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2015

Conversation

matklad
Copy link
Member

@matklad matklad commented Sep 3, 2015

As I understand, there are no proc closures in Rust any more. So this pr removes procedure_type production. It isn't used anywhere. The proc is still a keyword.

r? @steveklabnik
@bors: r+ rollup

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 59f2343 rollup

Thanks!

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Yeah, thanks so much for all of these!

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2015
…crichton

As I understand, there are no proc closures in Rust any more. So this pr removes `procedure_type` production. It isn't used anywhere. The `proc` is still a keyword.

r? @steveklabnik
@bors: r+ rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 59f2343 into rust-lang:master Sep 4, 2015
@matklad matklad deleted the grammar-remove-proc branch July 9, 2019 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants