Skip to content

core: impl Clone for option::IntoIter and iter::Once #26189

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2015

Conversation

bluss
Copy link
Member

@bluss bluss commented Jun 10, 2015

core: impl Clone for option::IntoIter and iter::Once

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @aturon (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@bluss
Copy link
Member Author

bluss commented Jun 10, 2015

Very small addition, I guess this was forgot when Once was added.

@Gankra
Copy link
Contributor

Gankra commented Jun 10, 2015

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 10, 2015

📌 Commit c00b859 has been approved by Gankro

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2015
core: impl Clone for option::IntoIter and iter::Once
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2015
@bors bors merged commit c00b859 into rust-lang:master Jun 11, 2015
@bluss bluss deleted the iter-once-clone branch June 11, 2015 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants