Skip to content

Fix link to C++ FQA #25453

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2015
Merged

Fix link to C++ FQA #25453

merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2015

Conversation

jimblandy
Copy link
Contributor

Fix the link to the "static initialization order fiasco" discussion in the C++ Frequently Questioned Answers.

At present the link points to a mail message summarizing the decision not to have resumable exceptions, but the FAQ means to refer to a discussion of the "static initialization order fiasco". I've made my best guess at what it meant to refer to.

Fix the link to the "static initialization order fiasco" discussion in the C++ Frequently Questioned Answers.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@jimblandy
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @steveklabnik

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 742ad41 rollup

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 16, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 742ad41 with merge 0becf6a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2015
Fix the link to the "static initialization order fiasco" discussion in the C++ Frequently Questioned Answers.

At present the link points to a mail message summarizing the decision not to have resumable exceptions, but the FAQ means to refer to a discussion of the "static initialization order fiasco". I've made my best guess at what it meant to refer to.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 16, 2015

@bors bors merged commit 742ad41 into rust-lang:master May 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants