Update bors e-mail lookup

[Kobzol]

This should hopefully fix the post-merge CI workflow and git change detection in bootstrap.

[rustbot]

r? @jdno

rustbot has assigned @jdno.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[Kobzol]

@bors p=50

[jieyouxu]

Thanks

View changes since this review

[jieyouxu]

@bors r+ rollup=never

[rust-bors]

📌 Commit f2d0d52 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[rust-bors]

☀️ Test successful - CI
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing 598c7bd to main...

[github-actions]

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 548e586 (parent) -> 598c7bd (this PR)

Test differences

Show 2 test diffs

2 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 598c7bde3843ca604a9ee1df9491ee418d771edf --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

1. x86_64-gnu-miri: 4198.9s -> 5366.8s (+27.8%)
2. dist-x86_64-apple: 6097.1s -> 7158.6s (+17.4%)
3. x86_64-gnu-gcc: 3464.3s -> 3989.5s (+15.2%)
4. pr-check-2: 2168.5s -> 2491.9s (+14.9%)
5. aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-1: 3264.5s -> 3674.8s (+12.6%)
6. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2781.7s -> 3128.4s (+12.5%)
7. pr-check-1: 1709.9s -> 1920.6s (+12.3%)
8. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-1: 3985.6s -> 4442.7s (+11.5%)
9. i686-gnu-2: 5403.5s -> 6016.2s (+11.3%)
10. test-various: 6989.5s -> 7777.3s (+11.3%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (598c7bd): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.6%, secondary -4.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.6%	[1.9%, 3.2%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.9%	[-4.9%, -4.9%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.6%	[1.9%, 3.2%]	4

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 474.664s -> 474.717s (0.01%)
Artifact size: 390.87 MiB -> 390.81 MiB (-0.01%)