Rollup of 7 pull requests #143760
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #143760
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Implement timeout support for read, write and connect. - A software implementation using Instant. Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
Add a setsid method to the CommandExt trait so that callers can create a process in a new session and process group whilst still using the POSIX spawn fast path. Co-Authored-By: Harvey Hunt <harveyhunt@fb.com>
Ralf suggested in <rust-lang#143410 (comment)> that UB transmutes shouldn't be trapping, which happened for the one path that PR was changing, but there's another path as well, so this PR changes that other path to match.
In the implementation (rust-lang#140035), this was left as an open question for the tracking issue (rust-lang#136889). My assumption is that this should be carried over. Thankfully, either way, `-Zunpretty` is unstable and we can always change it even if we stabilize frontmatter.
So places that need `unreachable` but in the middle of a basic block can call that instead of figuring out the best way to do it.
Additionally, remove unused `tests/ui/auxiliary/svh-*` crates that are duplicates of `tests/ui/svh/auxiliary/svh-*`.
…rkingjubilee rust: library: Add `setsid` method to `CommandExt` trait Add a setsid method to the CommandExt trait so that callers can create a process in a new session and process group whilst still using the POSIX spawn fast path. Tracking issue: rust-lang#105376 ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#184 This PR was previously submitted by `@HarveyHunt` (whom I marked as Co-Author in the commit message) in rust-lang#105377. However that PR went stale. I applied the [suggestion](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105377/files/231d19fcbfe155b2e85116865adae4253380ff1f#r1893457943) to change the function signature to `fn setsid(&mut self, setsid: bool) -> &mut Command`.
`tests/ui`: A New Order [26/N] > [!NOTE] > > Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge. Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang#133895. r? `@tgross35`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [27/N] > [!NOTE] > > Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge. Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang#133895. r? `@tgross35`
`tests/ui`: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART > [!NOTE] > > Intermediate commits are intended to help review, but will be squashed prior to merge. Some `tests/ui/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/`. Part of rust-lang#133895. r? `@tgross35`
…oss35 std: sys: net: uefi: tcp4: Add timeout support - Implement timeout support for read, write and connect. - A software implementation using Instant.
fix: Include frontmatter in -Zunpretty output In the implementation (rust-lang#140035), this was left as an open question for the tracking issue (rust-lang#136889). My assumption is that this should be carried over. The test was carried over from rust-lang#137193 which was superseded by rust-lang#140035. Thankfully, either way, `-Zunpretty` is unstable and we can always change it even if we stabilize frontmatter.
…fleLapkin Make UB transmutes really UB in LLVM Ralf suggested in <rust-lang#143410 (comment)> that UB transmutes shouldn't be trapping, which happened for the one path *that* PR was changing, but there's another path as well, so *this* PR changes that other path to match. r? codegen
rustbot
added
O-unix
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #142391 (rust: library: Add `setsid` method to `CommandExt` trait) - #143301 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [26/N]) - #143302 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [27/N]) - #143303 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART) - #143568 (std: sys: net: uefi: tcp4: Add timeout support) - #143708 (fix: Include frontmatter in -Zunpretty output ) - #143718 (Make UB transmutes really UB in LLVM) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #142391 (rust: library: Add `setsid` method to `CommandExt` trait) - #143301 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [26/N]) - #143302 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [27/N]) - #143303 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART) - #143568 (std: sys: net: uefi: tcp4: Add timeout support) - #143708 (fix: Include frontmatter in -Zunpretty output ) - #143718 (Make UB transmutes really UB in LLVM) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #143762) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@bors r- |
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-author
|
Now we'll never know 😆 #t-infra > Conflict on in-progress merge |
|
Didn't check Zulip 😅 I saw that GitHub was even showing a merge conflict so I assumed/hoped that something would fail. Given that it happened once, I'm sure it'll happen eventually again… |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
setsidmethod toCommandExttrait #142391 (rust: library: Addsetsidmethod toCommandExttrait)tests/ui: A New Order [26/N] #143301 (tests/ui: A New Order [26/N])tests/ui: A New Order [27/N] #143302 (tests/ui: A New Order [27/N])tests/ui: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART #143303 (tests/ui: A New Order [28/28] FINAL PART)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup