-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Be a bit more careful around exotic cycles in in the inliner #143704
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -64,15 +64,15 @@ fn process<'tcx>( | |
typing_env: ty::TypingEnv<'tcx>, | ||
caller: ty::Instance<'tcx>, | ||
target: LocalDefId, | ||
seen: &mut FxHashSet<ty::Instance<'tcx>>, | ||
seen: &mut FxHashMap<ty::Instance<'tcx>, bool>, | ||
involved: &mut FxHashSet<LocalDefId>, | ||
recursion_limiter: &mut FxHashMap<DefId, usize>, | ||
recursion_limit: Limit, | ||
) -> bool { | ||
trace!(%caller); | ||
let mut cycle_found = false; | ||
let mut reaches_root = false; | ||
|
||
for &(callee, args) in tcx.mir_inliner_callees(caller.def) { | ||
for &(callee_def_id, args) in tcx.mir_inliner_callees(caller.def) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. with the name |
||
let Ok(args) = caller.try_instantiate_mir_and_normalize_erasing_regions( | ||
tcx, | ||
typing_env, | ||
|
@@ -81,14 +81,17 @@ fn process<'tcx>( | |
trace!(?caller, ?typing_env, ?args, "cannot normalize, skipping"); | ||
continue; | ||
}; | ||
let Ok(Some(callee)) = ty::Instance::try_resolve(tcx, typing_env, callee, args) else { | ||
trace!(?callee, "cannot resolve, skipping"); | ||
let Ok(Some(callee)) = ty::Instance::try_resolve(tcx, typing_env, callee_def_id, args) | ||
else { | ||
trace!(?callee_def_id, "cannot resolve, skipping"); | ||
continue; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
// Found a path. | ||
if callee.def_id() == target.to_def_id() { | ||
cycle_found = true; | ||
reaches_root = true; | ||
seen.insert(callee, true); | ||
continue; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think it's necessary to recurse on callees here, so I just |
||
} | ||
|
||
if tcx.is_constructor(callee.def_id()) { | ||
|
@@ -101,10 +104,17 @@ fn process<'tcx>( | |
continue; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if seen.insert(callee) { | ||
let callee_reaches_root = if let Some(&c) = seen.get(&callee) { | ||
// Even if we have seen this callee before, and thus don't need | ||
// to recurse into it, we still need to propagate whether it reaches | ||
// the root so that we can mark all the involved callers, in case we | ||
// end up reaching that same recursive callee through some *other* cycle. | ||
c | ||
} else { | ||
seen.insert(callee, false); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think it's safe to consider this to be |
||
let recursion = recursion_limiter.entry(callee.def_id()).or_default(); | ||
trace!(?callee, recursion = *recursion); | ||
let found_recursion = if recursion_limit.value_within_limit(*recursion) { | ||
let callee_reaches_root = if recursion_limit.value_within_limit(*recursion) { | ||
*recursion += 1; | ||
ensure_sufficient_stack(|| { | ||
process( | ||
|
@@ -122,17 +132,19 @@ fn process<'tcx>( | |
// Pessimistically assume that there could be recursion. | ||
true | ||
}; | ||
if found_recursion { | ||
if let Some(callee) = callee.def_id().as_local() { | ||
// Calling `optimized_mir` of a non-local definition cannot cycle. | ||
involved.insert(callee); | ||
} | ||
cycle_found = true; | ||
seen.insert(callee, callee_reaches_root); | ||
callee_reaches_root | ||
}; | ||
if callee_reaches_root { | ||
if let Some(callee_def_id) = callee.def_id().as_local() { | ||
// Calling `optimized_mir` of a non-local definition cannot cycle. | ||
involved.insert(callee_def_id); | ||
} | ||
reaches_root = true; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
cycle_found | ||
reaches_root | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(tcx), ret)] | ||
|
@@ -166,7 +178,7 @@ pub(crate) fn mir_callgraph_cyclic<'tcx>( | |
typing_env, | ||
root_instance, | ||
root, | ||
&mut FxHashSet::default(), | ||
&mut FxHashMap::default(), | ||
&mut involved, | ||
&mut FxHashMap::default(), | ||
recursion_limit, | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ | ||
- // MIR for `a` before Inline | ||
+ // MIR for `a` after Inline | ||
|
||
fn a() -> () { | ||
let mut _0: (); | ||
let _1: (); | ||
let mut _2: (); | ||
let _3: (); | ||
let mut _4: (); | ||
+ let mut _5: fn() {a}; | ||
+ let mut _6: fn() {b}; | ||
+ scope 1 (inlined <fn() {a} as FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn() {a})) { | ||
+ } | ||
+ scope 2 (inlined <fn() {b} as FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn() {b})) { | ||
+ } | ||
|
||
bb0: { | ||
StorageLive(_1); | ||
StorageLive(_2); | ||
_2 = (); | ||
- _1 = <fn() {a} as FnOnce<()>>::call_once(a, move _2) -> [return: bb1, unwind continue]; | ||
+ StorageLive(_5); | ||
+ _5 = a; | ||
+ _1 = move _5() -> [return: bb1, unwind continue]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
bb1: { | ||
+ StorageDead(_5); | ||
StorageDead(_2); | ||
StorageDead(_1); | ||
StorageLive(_3); | ||
StorageLive(_4); | ||
_4 = (); | ||
- _3 = <fn() {b} as FnOnce<()>>::call_once(b, move _4) -> [return: bb2, unwind continue]; | ||
+ StorageLive(_6); | ||
+ _6 = b; | ||
+ _3 = move _6() -> [return: bb2, unwind continue]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
bb2: { | ||
+ StorageDead(_6); | ||
StorageDead(_4); | ||
StorageDead(_3); | ||
_0 = const (); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ | ||
- // MIR for `b` before Inline | ||
+ // MIR for `b` after Inline | ||
|
||
fn b() -> () { | ||
let mut _0: (); | ||
let _1: (); | ||
let mut _2: (); | ||
let _3: (); | ||
let mut _4: (); | ||
+ let mut _5: fn() {b}; | ||
+ let mut _6: fn() {a}; | ||
+ scope 1 (inlined <fn() {b} as FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn() {b})) { | ||
+ } | ||
+ scope 2 (inlined <fn() {a} as FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn() {a})) { | ||
+ } | ||
|
||
bb0: { | ||
StorageLive(_1); | ||
StorageLive(_2); | ||
_2 = (); | ||
- _1 = <fn() {b} as FnOnce<()>>::call_once(b, move _2) -> [return: bb1, unwind continue]; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It's nice to see we didn't break inlining at least for the |
||
+ StorageLive(_5); | ||
+ _5 = b; | ||
+ _1 = move _5() -> [return: bb1, unwind continue]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
bb1: { | ||
+ StorageDead(_5); | ||
StorageDead(_2); | ||
StorageDead(_1); | ||
StorageLive(_3); | ||
StorageLive(_4); | ||
_4 = (); | ||
- _3 = <fn() {a} as FnOnce<()>>::call_once(a, move _4) -> [return: bb2, unwind continue]; | ||
+ StorageLive(_6); | ||
+ _6 = a; | ||
+ _3 = move _6() -> [return: bb2, unwind continue]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
bb2: { | ||
+ StorageDead(_6); | ||
StorageDead(_4); | ||
StorageDead(_3); | ||
_0 = const (); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
// EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_PANIC_STRATEGY | ||
// skip-filecheck | ||
//@ test-mir-pass: Inline | ||
//@ edition: 2021 | ||
//@ compile-flags: -Zinline-mir --crate-type=lib | ||
|
||
// EMIT_MIR inline_double_cycle.a.Inline.diff | ||
// EMIT_MIR inline_double_cycle.b.Inline.diff | ||
|
||
#![feature(fn_traits)] | ||
|
||
#[inline] | ||
pub fn a() { | ||
FnOnce::call_once(a, ()); | ||
FnOnce::call_once(b, ()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[inline] | ||
pub fn b() { | ||
FnOnce::call_once(b, ()); | ||
FnOnce::call_once(a, ()); | ||
} |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is more like "may reach root" given that we bail out with a possibly false-positive when hitting the recursion limit, but that was a mouthful.