Skip to content

unpretty=thir-tree: don't require the final expr to be the body's value #141357

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dianne
Copy link
Contributor

@dianne dianne commented May 21, 2025

Two motivations for this:

  • I couldn't find a comment motivating this hard-coding. I can imagine it might be easier to read unpretty=thir-flat output if the final expression in the THIR is always the body's value, but if that's the reason, that should be the justification in the source. I can also imagine it's meant to check that all expressions will be visited by the pretty-printer, but the existing check doesn't quite do that either.
  • Guard patterns (Tracking issue for RFC 3637: Guard patterns #129967) contain expressions, so lowering params containing guard patterns may add more expressions to the THIR. Currently a body's params are lowered after its expression, so guard expressions in params would end up last, breaking this. As an alternative, the params could be lowered first (lower bodies' params to thir before the body's value #141356).

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 21, 2025

r? @nnethercote

rustbot has assigned @nnethercote.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah. A bit strange invariant to preserve, especially b/c it's so easy to avoid lol

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 21, 2025

📌 Commit f2d94c1 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 21, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
…dy-expr, r=compiler-errors

lower bodies' params to thir before the body's value

Two motivations for this:
- Lowering params first means errors from lowering the params are emitted before errors from lowering the body's expression. This comes up in [tests/ui/associated-consts/associated-const-type-parameter-pattern.stderr](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:thir-lower-params-before-body-expr?expand=1#diff-acac6ea10e991af0da91633e08b2739f9f9ca0c8f826401b6ba829914d0806f2), where both the params and expression encounter errors in translating consts to patterns. This change puts the errors in the order they appear in the source file.
- Guard patterns (rust-lang#129967) contain expressions, so lowering params containing guard patterns may add more expressions to the THIR. However, there's a check for `-Zunpretty=thir-tree` that the final expression in the THIR corresponds to its value [(link)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c43786c9b7b8d8dcc3f9c604e0e3074c16ed69d3/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/mod.rs#L453-L455); lowering params last would break this. As an alternative way to get guard patterns to work, I think the pretty-printer could use the expression returned by `thir_body` and the check could be removed or changed (rust-lang#141357).
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#140526 (docs: Specify that common sort functions sort in an ascending direction)
 - rust-lang#141230 (std: fix doctest and explain for `as_slices` and `as_mut_slices` in `VecDeque`)
 - rust-lang#141341 (limit impls of `VaArgSafe` to just types that are actually safe)
 - rust-lang#141347 (incorrectly prefer builtin `dyn` impls :3)
 - rust-lang#141351 (Move -Zcrate-attr injection to just after crate root parsing)
 - rust-lang#141356 (lower bodies' params to thir before the body's value)
 - rust-lang#141357 (`unpretty=thir-tree`: don't require the final expr to be the body's value)
 - rust-lang#141363 (Document why we allow escaping bound vars in LTA norm)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2663ea3 into rust-lang:master May 22, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 22, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#141357 - dianne:unhardcode-unpretty-thir-tree-body-expr, r=compiler-errors

`unpretty=thir-tree`: don't require the final expr to be the body's value

Two motivations for this:
- I couldn't find a comment motivating this hard-coding. I can imagine it might be easier to read `unpretty=thir-flat` output if the final expression in the THIR is always the body's value, but if that's the reason, that should be the justification in the source. I can also imagine it's meant to check that all expressions will be visited by the pretty-printer, but the existing check doesn't quite do that either.
- Guard patterns (rust-lang#129967) contain expressions, so lowering params containing guard patterns may add more expressions to the THIR. Currently a body's params are lowered after its expression, so guard expressions in params would end up last, breaking this. As an alternative, the params could be lowered first (rust-lang#141356).
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#141356 - dianne:thir-lower-params-before-body-expr, r=compiler-errors

lower bodies' params to thir before the body's value

Two motivations for this:
- Lowering params first means errors from lowering the params are emitted before errors from lowering the body's expression. This comes up in [tests/ui/associated-consts/associated-const-type-parameter-pattern.stderr](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:thir-lower-params-before-body-expr?expand=1#diff-acac6ea10e991af0da91633e08b2739f9f9ca0c8f826401b6ba829914d0806f2), where both the params and expression encounter errors in translating consts to patterns. This change puts the errors in the order they appear in the source file.
- Guard patterns (rust-lang#129967) contain expressions, so lowering params containing guard patterns may add more expressions to the THIR. However, there's a check for `-Zunpretty=thir-tree` that the final expression in the THIR corresponds to its value [(link)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/c43786c9b7b8d8dcc3f9c604e0e3074c16ed69d3/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/mod.rs#L453-L455); lowering params last would break this. As an alternative way to get guard patterns to work, I think the pretty-printer could use the expression returned by `thir_body` and the check could be removed or changed (rust-lang#141357).
@dianne dianne deleted the unhardcode-unpretty-thir-tree-body-expr branch May 22, 2025 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants