- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
[rustdoc] Unify type aliases rendering with other ADT #140863
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            8 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      5f857a9
              
                Rename `clean::Enum::variants` method into `non_stripped_variants`
              
              
                GuillaumeGomez 560aec1
              
                Unify rendering of type aliases without ADT items
              
              
                GuillaumeGomez 4194745
              
                Split `Item::attributes` method into three
              
              
                GuillaumeGomez eb9f054
              
                Rename the `document_*` argument/field into `is_type_alias`
              
              
                GuillaumeGomez 4f3dd7b
              
                Tweak attribute rendering depending on wether or not it is a type alias
              
              
                GuillaumeGomez 2b292d1
              
                Add regression test for #140739
              
              
                GuillaumeGomez 3646a09
              
                Improve code
              
              
                GuillaumeGomez ec97b0f
              
                Update to new API
              
              
                GuillaumeGomez File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't this make more sense as
has_stripped_variants? Am I missing something?Ofc if we're doing that we should rename the other
has_stripped_entriesfor consistency, I think that seems pretty in line with all the other refactoring going on here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe I'm the one who missed something. 😆
A type alias can be an alias of an enum, a union or a struct. Of these three, 2 have fields and one has variants. So in this case, neither "fields" nor "variants" can be used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, you're right. really it's the other
has_stripped_entriesthat look odd, since in those cases we do actually know if its a field or variant. i guess it makes sense to keep the names the same, and i suppose the function body is simple enough it doesn't need a doc comment.