- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 13.9k
 
          Convert tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs to a known-bug test
          #139740
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    
              
                    nnethercote
  
              
              reviewed
              
                  
                    Apr 13, 2025 
                  
              
              
            
            
| //! - `dead_code` lint expansion for self-assignments was implemented in #87129. | ||
| //! - Unfortunately implementation components of #87129 had to be disabled as part of reverts | ||
| //! #86212, #83171 (to revert #81473) to address regressions #81626 and #81658. | ||
| //! - Consequently, none of the following warnings are emitted. | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice explanation.
| 
           @bors r+  | 
    
| 
           @bors rollup  | 
    
    
  ChrisDenton 
      added a commit
        to ChrisDenton/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 13, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Convert `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs` to a known-bug test I did a survey pass over `tests/`, and this test seems like the only candidate suitable for conversion into a known-bug test. (Other tests had varying degrees of other issues that known-bug would not be suitable.) r? compiler
    
  ChrisDenton 
      added a commit
        to ChrisDenton/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 13, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Convert `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs` to a known-bug test I did a survey pass over `tests/`, and this test seems like the only candidate suitable for conversion into a known-bug test. (Other tests had varying degrees of other issues that known-bug would not be suitable.) r? compiler
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 13, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…enton Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#138744 (Add methods to TCP and UDP sockets to modify hop limit (refresh of rust-lang#94678)) - rust-lang#138962 (Expect an array when expected and acutal types are both arrays during cast) - rust-lang#139001 (add `naked_functions_rustic_abi` feature gate) - rust-lang#139379 (Use delayed bug for normalization errors in drop elaboration) - rust-lang#139582 (Various coercion cleanups) - rust-lang#139628 (Suggest remove redundant `$()?` around `vis`) - rust-lang#139644 (Micro-optimize `InstSimplify`'s `simplify_primitive_clone`) - rust-lang#139666 (cleanup `mir_borrowck`) - rust-lang#139674 (In `rustc_mir_transform`, iterate over index newtypes instead of ints) - rust-lang#139695 (compiletest: consistently use `camino::{Utf8Path,Utf8PathBuf}` throughout) - rust-lang#139722 (Move some things to rustc_type_ir) - rust-lang#139740 (Convert `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs` to a known-bug test) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  jhpratt 
      added a commit
        to jhpratt/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 13, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Convert `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs` to a known-bug test I did a survey pass over `tests/`, and this test seems like the only candidate suitable for conversion into a known-bug test. (Other tests had varying degrees of other issues that known-bug would not be suitable.) r? compiler
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 13, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137043 (Initial `UnsafePinned` implementation [Part 1: Libs]) - rust-lang#138962 (Expect an array when expected and acutal types are both arrays during cast) - rust-lang#139001 (add `naked_functions_rustic_abi` feature gate) - rust-lang#139379 (Use delayed bug for normalization errors in drop elaboration) - rust-lang#139582 (Various coercion cleanups) - rust-lang#139628 (Suggest remove redundant `$()?` around `vis`) - rust-lang#139644 (Micro-optimize `InstSimplify`'s `simplify_primitive_clone`) - rust-lang#139671 (Proc macro span API redesign: Replace proc_macro::SourceFile by Span::{file, local_file}) - rust-lang#139674 (In `rustc_mir_transform`, iterate over index newtypes instead of ints) - rust-lang#139740 (Convert `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs` to a known-bug test) - rust-lang#139741 (fix smir's run! doc and import) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 14, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137043 (Initial `UnsafePinned` implementation [Part 1: Libs]) - rust-lang#138962 (Expect an array when expected and acutal types are both arrays during cast) - rust-lang#139001 (add `naked_functions_rustic_abi` feature gate) - rust-lang#139379 (Use delayed bug for normalization errors in drop elaboration) - rust-lang#139582 (Various coercion cleanups) - rust-lang#139628 (Suggest remove redundant `$()?` around `vis`) - rust-lang#139644 (Micro-optimize `InstSimplify`'s `simplify_primitive_clone`) - rust-lang#139674 (In `rustc_mir_transform`, iterate over index newtypes instead of ints) - rust-lang#139740 (Convert `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs` to a known-bug test) - rust-lang#139741 (fix smir's run! doc and import) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  rust-timer 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 14, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139740 - jieyouxu:known-bug, r=nnethercote Convert `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs` to a known-bug test I did a survey pass over `tests/`, and this test seems like the only candidate suitable for conversion into a known-bug test. (Other tests had varying degrees of other issues that known-bug would not be suitable.) r? compiler
    
  matthiaskrgr 
      added a commit
        to matthiaskrgr/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 14, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Use `compiletest-ignore-dir` for bootstrap self-tests Follow-up to rust-lang#139705 and rust-lang#139740. I did another survey pass over `//@ ignore-test` under `tests/`, and this is the only 2 non-tests that should use `compiletest-ignore-dir`. r? `@Zalathar` (or compiler/bootstrap)
    
  Zalathar 
      added a commit
        to Zalathar/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 15, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Use `compiletest-ignore-dir` for bootstrap self-tests Follow-up to rust-lang#139705 and rust-lang#139740. I did another survey pass over `//@ ignore-test` under `tests/`, and this is the only 2 non-tests that should use `compiletest-ignore-dir`. r? ``@Zalathar`` (or compiler/bootstrap)
    
  jieyouxu 
      added a commit
        to jieyouxu/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 15, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Use `compiletest-ignore-dir` for bootstrap self-tests Follow-up to rust-lang#139705 and rust-lang#139740. I did another survey pass over `//@ ignore-test` under `tests/`, and this is the only 2 non-tests that should use `compiletest-ignore-dir`. r? ```@Zalathar``` (or compiler/bootstrap)
    
  rust-timer 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 15, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139783 - jieyouxu:ignore-dir, r=Zalathar Use `compiletest-ignore-dir` for bootstrap self-tests Follow-up to rust-lang#139705 and rust-lang#139740. I did another survey pass over `//@ ignore-test` under `tests/`, and this is the only 2 non-tests that should use `compiletest-ignore-dir`. r? `@Zalathar` (or compiler/bootstrap)
    
  matthiaskrgr 
      added a commit
        to matthiaskrgr/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 17, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Introduce and use specialized `//@ ignore-auxiliary` for test support files instead of using `//@ ignore-test` ### Summary Add a semantically meaningful directive for ignoring test *auxiliary* files. This is for auxiliary files that *participate* in actual tests but should not be built by `compiletest` (i.e. these files are involved through `mod xxx;` or `include!()` or `#[path = "xxx"]`, etc.). ### Motivation A specialized directive like `//@ ignore-auxiliary` makes it way easier to audit disabled tests via `//@ ignore-test`. - These support files cannot use the canonical `auxiliary/` dir because they participate in module resolution or are included, or their relative paths can be important for test intention otherwise. Follow-up to: - rust-lang#139705 - rust-lang#139783 - rust-lang#139740 See also discussions in: - [#t-compiler > Directive name for non-test aux files?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Directive.20name.20for.20non-test.20aux.20files.3F/with/512773817) - [#t-compiler > Handling disabled &rust-lang#96;//@ ignore-test&rust-lang#96; tests](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Handling.20disabled.20.60.2F.2F.40.20ignore-test.60.20tests/with/512005974) - [#t-compiler/meetings > &rust-lang#91;steering&rust-lang#93; 2025-04-11 Dealing with disabled tests](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bsteering.5D.202025-04-11.20Dealing.20with.20disabled.20tests/with/511717981) ### Remarks on remaining unconditionally disabled tests under `tests/` After this PR, against commit 79a272c, only **14** remaining test files are disabled through `//@ ignore-test`: <details> <summary>Remaining `//@ ignore-test` files under `tests/`</summary> ``` tests/debuginfo/drop-locations.rs 4://@ ignore-test (broken, see rust-lang#128971) tests/rustdoc/macro-document-private-duplicate.rs 1://@ ignore-test (fails spuriously, see issue rust-lang#89228) tests/rustdoc/inline_cross/assoc-const-equality.rs 3://@ ignore-test (FIXME: rust-lang#125092) tests/ui/match/issue-27021.rs 7://@ ignore-test (rust-lang#54987) tests/ui/match/issue-26996.rs 7://@ ignore-test (rust-lang#54987) tests/ui/issues/issue-49298.rs 9://@ ignore-test (rust-lang#54987) tests/ui/issues/issue-59756.rs 2://@ ignore-test (rustfix needs multiple suggestions) tests/ui/precondition-checks/write.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/precondition-checks/read.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/precondition-checks/write_bytes.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/explicit-tail-calls/drop-order.rs 2://@ ignore-test: tail calls are not implemented in rustc_codegen_ssa yet, so this causes 🧊 tests/ui/panics/panic-short-backtrace-windows-x86_64.rs 3://@ ignore-test (rust-lang#92000) tests/ui/json/json-bom-plus-crlf-multifile-aux.rs 3://@ ignore-test Not a test. Used by other tests tests/ui/traits/next-solver/object-soundness-requires-generalization.rs 2://@ ignore-test (see rust-lang#114196) ``` </details> Of these, most are either **unimplemented**, or **spurious**, or **known-broken**. The outstanding one is `tests/ui/json/json-bom-plus-crlf-multifile-aux.rs` which I did not want to touch in *this* PR -- that aux file has load-bearing BOM and carriage returns and byte offset matters. I think those test files that require special encoding / BOM probably are better off as `run-make` tests. See rust-lang#139968 for that aux file. ### Review advice - Best reviewed commit-by-commit. - The directive name diverged from the most voted `//@ auxiliary` because I think that's easy to confuse with `//@ aux-{crate,dir}`. r? compiler
    
  rust-timer 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Apr 18, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139967 - jieyouxu:auxiliary, r=wesleywiser Introduce and use specialized `//@ ignore-auxiliary` for test support files instead of using `//@ ignore-test` ### Summary Add a semantically meaningful directive for ignoring test *auxiliary* files. This is for auxiliary files that *participate* in actual tests but should not be built by `compiletest` (i.e. these files are involved through `mod xxx;` or `include!()` or `#[path = "xxx"]`, etc.). ### Motivation A specialized directive like `//@ ignore-auxiliary` makes it way easier to audit disabled tests via `//@ ignore-test`. - These support files cannot use the canonical `auxiliary/` dir because they participate in module resolution or are included, or their relative paths can be important for test intention otherwise. Follow-up to: - rust-lang#139705 - rust-lang#139783 - rust-lang#139740 See also discussions in: - [#t-compiler > Directive name for non-test aux files?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Directive.20name.20for.20non-test.20aux.20files.3F/with/512773817) - [#t-compiler > Handling disabled &rust-lang#96;//@ ignore-test&rust-lang#96; tests](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Handling.20disabled.20.60.2F.2F.40.20ignore-test.60.20tests/with/512005974) - [#t-compiler/meetings > &rust-lang#91;steering&rust-lang#93; 2025-04-11 Dealing with disabled tests](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bsteering.5D.202025-04-11.20Dealing.20with.20disabled.20tests/with/511717981) ### Remarks on remaining unconditionally disabled tests under `tests/` After this PR, against commit 79a272c, only **14** remaining test files are disabled through `//@ ignore-test`: <details> <summary>Remaining `//@ ignore-test` files under `tests/`</summary> ``` tests/debuginfo/drop-locations.rs 4://@ ignore-test (broken, see rust-lang#128971) tests/rustdoc/macro-document-private-duplicate.rs 1://@ ignore-test (fails spuriously, see issue rust-lang#89228) tests/rustdoc/inline_cross/assoc-const-equality.rs 3://@ ignore-test (FIXME: rust-lang#125092) tests/ui/match/issue-27021.rs 7://@ ignore-test (rust-lang#54987) tests/ui/match/issue-26996.rs 7://@ ignore-test (rust-lang#54987) tests/ui/issues/issue-49298.rs 9://@ ignore-test (rust-lang#54987) tests/ui/issues/issue-59756.rs 2://@ ignore-test (rustfix needs multiple suggestions) tests/ui/precondition-checks/write.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/precondition-checks/read.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/precondition-checks/write_bytes.rs 5://@ ignore-test (unimplemented) tests/ui/explicit-tail-calls/drop-order.rs 2://@ ignore-test: tail calls are not implemented in rustc_codegen_ssa yet, so this causes 🧊 tests/ui/panics/panic-short-backtrace-windows-x86_64.rs 3://@ ignore-test (rust-lang#92000) tests/ui/json/json-bom-plus-crlf-multifile-aux.rs 3://@ ignore-test Not a test. Used by other tests tests/ui/traits/next-solver/object-soundness-requires-generalization.rs 2://@ ignore-test (see rust-lang#114196) ``` </details> Of these, most are either **unimplemented**, or **spurious**, or **known-broken**. The outstanding one is `tests/ui/json/json-bom-plus-crlf-multifile-aux.rs` which I did not want to touch in *this* PR -- that aux file has load-bearing BOM and carriage returns and byte offset matters. I think those test files that require special encoding / BOM probably are better off as `run-make` tests. See rust-lang#139968 for that aux file. ### Review advice - Best reviewed commit-by-commit. - The directive name diverged from the most voted `//@ auxiliary` because I think that's easy to confuse with `//@ aux-{crate,dir}`. r? compiler
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    A-testsuite
  Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc 
  
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  
    T-compiler
  Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
I did a survey pass over
tests/, and this test seems like the only candidate suitable for conversion into a known-bug test. (Other tests had varying degrees of other issues that known-bug would not be suitable.)r? compiler