Document why some "type mismatches" exist #136573
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors rollup |
compiler-errors
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2025
|
r? compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
…kingjubilee Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#133932 (Avoid using make_direct_deprecated() in extern "ptx-kernel") - rust-lang#136269 (Pass spans around new solver) - rust-lang#136550 (Fix `rustc_hidden_type_of_opaques` for RPITITs with no default body) - rust-lang#136558 (Document minimum supported host tooling on macOS) - rust-lang#136563 (Clean up `Trivial*Impls` macros) - rust-lang#136566 (Fix link in from_fn.rs) - rust-lang#136573 (Document why some "type mismatches" exist) - rust-lang#136583 (Only highlight unmatchable parameters at the definition site) - rust-lang#136587 (Update browser-ui-test version to `0.20.2`) - rust-lang#136590 (Implement RustcInternal for RawPtrKind) - rust-lang#136591 (Add `rustc_hir_pretty::expr_to_string` function) - rust-lang#136595 (Fix `unreachable_pub` lint for hermit target) - rust-lang#136611 (cg_llvm: Remove the `mod llvm_` hack, which should no longer be necessary) Failed merges: - rust-lang#136565 (compiler: Clean up weird `rustc_abi` reexports) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#136573 - oli-obk:document-literal-at-wrong-type-reason, r=compiler-errors Document why some "type mismatches" exist Just something I stumbled over and thought to save myself (and maybe others) the research time when encountering it again.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
…kingjubilee Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#133932 (Avoid using make_direct_deprecated() in extern "ptx-kernel") - rust-lang#136269 (Pass spans around new solver) - rust-lang#136550 (Fix `rustc_hidden_type_of_opaques` for RPITITs with no default body) - rust-lang#136558 (Document minimum supported host tooling on macOS) - rust-lang#136563 (Clean up `Trivial*Impls` macros) - rust-lang#136566 (Fix link in from_fn.rs) - rust-lang#136573 (Document why some "type mismatches" exist) - rust-lang#136583 (Only highlight unmatchable parameters at the definition site) - rust-lang#136587 (Update browser-ui-test version to `0.20.2`) - rust-lang#136590 (Implement RustcInternal for RawPtrKind) - rust-lang#136591 (Add `rustc_hir_pretty::expr_to_string` function) - rust-lang#136595 (Fix `unreachable_pub` lint for hermit target) - rust-lang#136611 (cg_llvm: Remove the `mod llvm_` hack, which should no longer be necessary) Failed merges: - rust-lang#136565 (compiler: Clean up weird `rustc_abi` reexports) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just something I stumbled over and thought to save myself (and maybe others) the research time when encountering it again.