Skip to content

Bump backtrace to rust-lang/backtrace-rs@4d7906b #135053

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Compare: rust-lang/backtrace-rs@230570f...4d7906b

Mostly cleanups and enabling backtraces for the RTEMS target.

r? @ghost

Compare: rust-lang/backtrace-rs@230570f...4d7906b

Mostly cleanups and enabling backtraces for the RTEMS target.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 3, 2025
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 3, 2025

📌 Commit 6f5fd6d has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 3, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 3, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 6f5fd6d with merge 870c13d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 3, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: workingjubilee
Pushing 870c13d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 3, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 870c13d into rust-lang:master Jan 3, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Jan 3, 2025
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (870c13d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.6% [3.6%, 3.6%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.4% [-1.4%, -1.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.1% [-1.4%, 3.6%] 2

Cycles

Results (primary 2.8%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.8% [2.8%, 2.8%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.8% [2.8%, 2.8%] 1

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.1% [0.0%, 0.1%] 12
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.1% [0.1%, 0.3%] 38
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [0.0%, 0.1%] 12

Bootstrap: 763.678s -> 763.847s (0.02%)
Artifact size: 325.50 MiB -> 325.57 MiB (0.02%)

@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the backtrace-without-ruzstd branch January 3, 2025 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants