Forbid overwriting types in typeck #134474
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @SparrowLii rustbot has assigned @SparrowLii. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2024
…ler-errors Forbid overwriting types in typeck While trying to figure out some type setting logic in rust-lang#134248 I realized that we sometimes set a type twice. While hopefully that would have been the same type, we didn't ensure that at all and just silently accepted it. So now we reject setting it twice, unless errors are happening, then we don't care. Best reviewed commit by commit. No behaviour change is intended.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#132056 (Stabilize `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]`) - rust-lang#133643 (-Znext-solver: modify candidate preference rules) - rust-lang#134418 (Advent of `tests/ui` (misc cleanups and improvements) [3/N]) - rust-lang#134432 (Fix intra doc links not generated inside footnote definitions) - rust-lang#134473 (chore: fix some typos) - rust-lang#134474 (Forbid overwriting types in typeck) - rust-lang#134477 (move lint_unused_mut into sub-fn) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#133702 (Variants::Single: do not use invalid VariantIdx for uninhabited enums) - rust-lang#134427 (ci: remove duplicate task definition) - rust-lang#134432 (Fix intra doc links not generated inside footnote definitions) - rust-lang#134437 (reduce compiler `Assemble` complexity) - rust-lang#134474 (Forbid overwriting types in typeck) - rust-lang#134477 (move lint_unused_mut into sub-fn) - rust-lang#134491 (Some destructor/drop related tweaks) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134474 - oli-obk:push-yomnkntvzlxw, r=compiler-errors Forbid overwriting types in typeck While trying to figure out some type setting logic in rust-lang#134248 I realized that we sometimes set a type twice. While hopefully that would have been the same type, we didn't ensure that at all and just silently accepted it. So now we reject setting it twice, unless errors are happening, then we don't care. Best reviewed commit by commit. No behaviour change is intended.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While trying to figure out some type setting logic in #134248 I realized that we sometimes set a type twice. While hopefully that would have been the same type, we didn't ensure that at all and just silently accepted it. So now we reject setting it twice, unless errors are happening, then we don't care.
Best reviewed commit by commit.
No behaviour change is intended.