-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14k
Add bad-reg inline assembly ui test for RISC-V and s390x #132516
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e97ba53
Add bad-reg inline assembly ui test for RISC-V and s390x
taiki-e 89a1077
Add more core stubs to `minicore`
jieyouxu 5596a59
Adjust tests to use minicore and rebless
jieyouxu a7520ad
Fix typo in tests/auxiliary/minicore.rs
taiki-e b07232d
Move tests/ui/abi/riscv32e-registers.rs to tests/ui/asm/riscv
taiki-e File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev
Previous commit
Move tests/ui/abi/riscv32e-registers.rs to tests/ui/asm/riscv
This also adds comments explaining the difference to bad-reg.rs.
- Loading branch information
commit b07232d95d2a98c53b74aca24e96cbab1f40f9ad
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a similar test for rv32e, actually: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b3f75cc872cfd306860c3ad76a239e719015f855/tests/ui/abi/riscv32e-registers.rs
I suppose we should merge them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think both should be placed in ui/asm/riscv, but I don't think they can be merged since they test checks that are performed at different stages.
asm!API (in,out,inout,etc.).Only code that passes the latter check is passed to LLVM, so it is probably difficult to test that both work in a single test file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moved tests/ui/abi/riscv32e-registers.rs to tests/ui/asm/riscv and added comments explaining the difference to bad-reg.rs. (b07232d)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I see. That makes sense, thank you! I wasn't entirely sure of which things were checked where.