-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reduce false positives of tail-expr-drop-order from consumed values #129864
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Reduce false positives of tail-expr-drop-order from consumed values #129864
Conversation
491fb13
to
de2d256
Compare
I also found that |
type Error = !; | ||
|
||
fn typeck_results(&self) -> Self::TypeckResults<'_> { | ||
self.0.typeck(self.1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is going to be extremely expensive for the query, for the record. I would probably make some helper that caches the typeck results after the first call, or better yet just load the typeck results yourself and pass them here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I should drop this code, since we are not using this anymore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dropped
match place_with_id.place.base { | ||
PlaceBase::Rvalue => { | ||
self.nodes.insert(place_with_id.hir_id); | ||
} | ||
PlaceBase::Local(id) => { | ||
self.nodes.insert(id); | ||
} | ||
PlaceBase::Upvar(upvar) => { | ||
self.nodes.insert(upvar.var_path.hir_id); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't this count partial moves as full moves? Isn't that still not correct for drop ordering?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, doesn't this not respect different paths correctly? What about consuming operations that happen on only one branch of a conditional path? I don't know if this sort of analysis is supported with ExprUseVisitor
, which has no "flow" state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For now I don't have a good strategy towards that. How do we track partial moves and drops currently? Can we invoke machinery from borrow checker or somewhere else for such information?
I have switched to treat partial moves not as full moves. It could still get noisy but still safe.
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn extract_tail_expr_consuming_nodes<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, def_id: DefId) -> &'tcx HirIdSet { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make this into a hook
, not a query
; I don't believe it needs any sort of caching, since that has overhead. This should also explain very clearly what it does.
I opened a zulip thread at https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/More.20precise.20lint.20impl.20for.20Edition.202024.20tail-expr-drop-order to discuss this lint, because as @compiler-errors mentioned I feel like this might almost need to be some kind of flow analysis. |
@rustbot author |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #130357) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
de2d256
to
08ec439
Compare
This PR changes MIR cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @davidtwco, @celinval, @vakaras Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift cc @bjorn3 These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri interpreter cc @rust-lang/miri |
place: Place<'tcx>, | ||
target: BasicBlock, | ||
unwind: UnwindAction, | ||
scope: Option<(DefId, ItemLocalId)>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please also add a comment explaining the meaning of this new field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you make this a ClearCrossCrate
? Then it can just be a HirId
.
08ec439
to
e71ad9f
Compare
@rustbot ready
|
I am looking at |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #130724) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
cc @jieyouxu I also gave a hard thought about upvars and whether we should lint against upvars. I have arrived at the conclusion that we should not lint against the case where upvars are dropped later than the tail expression temporaries. What I mean is the following example, where fn should_we_lint_or_not() -> impl FnOnce() -> (?, ?) {
let x = LoudDropper;
move || (x.f(), LoudDropper.f())
} Upvar I am going to flip the test on this to not linting against. |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
I want to see how this performs against the failures in the previous crater run: #129604 (comment) @bors try |
…ves-from-consumed-droppers, r=<try> Reduce false positives of tail-expr-drop-order from consumed values r? `@jieyouxu` To reduce false positives, the lint does not fire if the locals are consumed/moved, or the values with significant drop are consumed/moved at the tail expression location. For this, we rely on solving a small dataflow to determine whether a `Local` is either live, or moved/dropped. I am also printing the type involved for easier diagnosis.
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ rustc_fluent_macro = { path = "../rustc_fluent_macro" } | |||
rustc_hir = { path = "../rustc_hir" } | |||
rustc_index = { path = "../rustc_index" } | |||
rustc_infer = { path = "../rustc_infer" } | |||
rustc_lint = { path = "../rustc_lint" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't rustc_lint_defs
suffice?
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
@craterbot check p=1 crates=https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-129604/retry-regressed-list.txt start=master#38352b01ae4af9300be03b805d6db68c45e51068 end=try#7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf+rustflags=-Dtail_expr_drop_order |
🚨 Error: missing desired crates: {"dym", "maxplus", "vkopt-message-parser", "lucia", "rustoku_gui", "flp-tsl", "awsl-pest", "roast-2d", "cl-traits", "cleu-orm-derive", "future-iter", "ndsparse", "genai-custom", "restruct"} 🆘 If you have any trouble with Crater please ping |
@craterbot run mode=check-only p=1 crates=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/compiler-errors/cc84423a4a9fbc5eb598383fe2555467/raw/a11fe3433fefddaab0038ee75cd2e0ab8852748a/crates start=master#38352b01ae4af9300be03b805d6db68c45e51068 end=try#7014e13d5becc920d4bea3cd87942c8a13d359bf+rustflags=-Dtail_expr_drop_order |
👌 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
🚧 Experiment ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more |
🎉 Experiment
|
…er, r=<try> [crater] validate impact of marking more types as `#[rustc_insignificant_dtor]` on tail expr drop order lint Validate impact of rust-lang#130914 on rust-lang#129864 and the tail expr drop order lint. r? `@ghost`
…, r=Amanieu Mark some more types as having insignificant dtor These were caught by rust-lang#129864 (comment), which is implementing a lint for some changes in drop order for temporaries in tail expressions. Specifically, the destructors of `CString` and the bitpacked repr for `std::io::Error` are insignificant insofar as they don't have side-effects on things like locking or synchronization; they just free memory. See some discussion on rust-lang#89144 for what makes a drop impl "significant"
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130914 - compiler-errors:insignificant-dtor, r=Amanieu Mark some more types as having insignificant dtor These were caught by rust-lang#129864 (comment), which is implementing a lint for some changes in drop order for temporaries in tail expressions. Specifically, the destructors of `CString` and the bitpacked repr for `std::io::Error` are insignificant insofar as they don't have side-effects on things like locking or synchronization; they just free memory. See some discussion on rust-lang#89144 for what makes a drop impl "significant"
…t-2, r=<try> Reduce false positives of tail-expr-drop-order from consumed values (attempt #2) r? `@nikomatsakis` Related to rust-lang#129864 but not replacing, yet. Related to rust-lang#130836. This is an implementation of the approach suggested in the [Zulip stream](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/temporary.20drop.20order.20changes). A new MIR statement `BackwardsIncompatibleDrop` is added to the MIR syntax. The lint now works by inspecting possibly live move paths before at the `BackwardsIncompatibleDrop` location and the actual drop under the current edition, which should be one before Edition 2024 in practice.
…t-2, r=<try> Reduce false positives of tail-expr-drop-order from consumed values (attempt #2) r? `@nikomatsakis` Related to rust-lang#129864 but not replacing, yet. Related to rust-lang#130836. This is an implementation of the approach suggested in the [Zulip stream](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/temporary.20drop.20order.20changes). A new MIR statement `BackwardsIncompatibleDrop` is added to the MIR syntax. The lint now works by inspecting possibly live move paths before at the `BackwardsIncompatibleDrop` location and the actual drop under the current edition, which should be one before Edition 2024 in practice.
…t-2, r=<try> Reduce false positives of tail-expr-drop-order from consumed values (attempt #2) r? `@nikomatsakis` Tracked by rust-lang#123739. Related to rust-lang#129864 but not replacing, yet. Related to rust-lang#130836. This is an implementation of the approach suggested in the [Zulip stream](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/temporary.20drop.20order.20changes). A new MIR statement `BackwardsIncompatibleDrop` is added to the MIR syntax. The lint now works by inspecting possibly live move paths before at the `BackwardsIncompatibleDrop` location and the actual drop under the current edition, which should be one before Edition 2024 in practice.
…t-2, r=<try> Reduce false positives of tail-expr-drop-order from consumed values (attempt #2) r? `@nikomatsakis` Tracked by rust-lang#123739. Related to rust-lang#129864 but not replacing, yet. Related to rust-lang#130836. This is an implementation of the approach suggested in the [Zulip stream](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/temporary.20drop.20order.20changes). A new MIR statement `BackwardsIncompatibleDrop` is added to the MIR syntax. The lint now works by inspecting possibly live move paths before at the `BackwardsIncompatibleDrop` location and the actual drop under the current edition, which should be one before Edition 2024 in practice.
r? @jieyouxu
To reduce false positives, the lint does not fire if the locals are consumed/moved, or the values with significant drop are consumed/moved at the tail expression location.
For this, we rely on solving a small dataflow to determine whether a
Local
is either live, or moved/dropped.I am also printing the type involved for easier diagnosis.