Rollup of 7 pull requests

src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt

@@ -41,18 +41,15 @@ run-make/libtest-thread-limit/Makefile
 run-make/link-cfg/Makefile
 run-make/long-linker-command-lines-cmd-exe/Makefile
 run-make/long-linker-command-lines/Makefile
-run-make/lto-linkage-used-attr/Makefile
 run-make/macos-deployment-target/Makefile
 run-make/min-global-align/Makefile
 run-make/native-link-modifier-bundle/Makefile
 run-make/native-link-modifier-whole-archive/Makefile
 run-make/no-alloc-shim/Makefile
 run-make/no-builtins-attribute/Makefile
-run-make/no-duplicate-libs/Makefile
 run-make/panic-abort-eh_frame/Makefile
 run-make/pdb-buildinfo-cl-cmd/Makefile
 run-make/pgo-gen-lto/Makefile
-run-make/pgo-gen-no-imp-symbols/Makefile
 run-make/pgo-indirect-call-promotion/Makefile
 run-make/pointer-auth-link-with-c/Makefile
 run-make/print-calling-conventions/Makefile

tests/run-make/lto-linkage-used-attr/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// Link time optimizations (LTO) used to snip away some important symbols
+// when setting optimization level to 3 or higher.
+// This is an LLVM, not a rustc bug, fixed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145293
+// This test checks that the impl_* symbols are preserved as they should.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108030
+
+//@ only-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
+// Reason: some of the inline assembly directives are architecture-specific.
+
+use run_make_support::rustc;
+
+fn main() {
+    rustc().arg("-Cdebuginfo=0").opt_level("3").input("lib.rs").run();
+    rustc().arg("-Clto=fat").arg("-Cdebuginfo=0").opt_level("3").input("main.rs").run();
+}

tests/run-make/no-duplicate-libs/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// The rust compiler used to try to detect duplicated libraries in
+// the linking order and remove the duplicates... but certain edge cases,
+// such as the one presented in `foo` and `bar` in this test, demand precise
+// control over the link order, including duplicates. As the anti-duplication
+// filter was removed, this test should now successfully see main be compiled
+// and executed.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/12688
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+//@ ignore-msvc
+// Reason: native compilation results in an unresolved external symbol
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("foo");
+    build_native_static_lib("bar");
+    rustc().input("main.rs").run();
+    run("main");
+}

tests/run-make/pgo-gen-no-imp-symbols/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// LLVM's profiling instrumentation adds a few symbols that are used by the profiler runtime.
+// Since these show up as globals in the LLVM IR, the compiler generates dllimport-related
+// __imp_ stubs for them. This can lead to linker errors because the instrumentation
+// symbols have weak linkage or are in a comdat section, but the __imp_ stubs aren't.
+// Since profiler-related symbols were excluded from stub-generation in #59812, this has
+// been fixed, and this test checks that the llvm profile symbol appear, but without the
+// anomalous __imp_ stubs.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59812
+
+use run_make_support::{cwd, rfs, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    rustc()
+        .input("test.rs")
+        .emit("llvm-ir")
+        .opt()
+        .codegen_units(1)
+        .profile_generate(cwd())
+        .arg("-Zno-profiler-runtime")
+        .run();
+    let out = rfs::read_to_string("test.ll");
+    // We expect symbols starting with "__llvm_profile_".
+    assert!(out.contains("__llvm_profile_"));
+    // We do NOT expect the "__imp_" version of these symbols.
+    assert!(!out.contains("__imp___llvm_profile_")); // 64 bit
+    assert!(!out.contains("__imp____llvm_profile_")); // 32 bit
+}