Rollup of 7 pull requests

src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt

@@ -23,13 +23,8 @@ run-make/emit-to-stdout/Makefile
 run-make/export-executable-symbols/Makefile
 run-make/extern-diff-internal-name/Makefile
 run-make/extern-flag-disambiguates/Makefile
-run-make/extern-fn-explicit-align/Makefile
 run-make/extern-fn-generic/Makefile
-run-make/extern-fn-mangle/Makefile
 run-make/extern-fn-reachable/Makefile
-run-make/extern-fn-struct-passing-abi/Makefile
-run-make/extern-fn-with-extern-types/Makefile
-run-make/extern-fn-with-packed-struct/Makefile
 run-make/extern-fn-with-union/Makefile
 run-make/extern-multiple-copies/Makefile
 run-make/extern-multiple-copies2/Makefile
@@ -44,7 +39,6 @@ run-make/issue-107094/Makefile
 run-make/issue-14698/Makefile
 run-make/issue-15460/Makefile
 run-make/issue-22131/Makefile
-run-make/issue-25581/Makefile
 run-make/issue-26006/Makefile
 run-make/issue-28595/Makefile
 run-make/issue-33329/Makefile
@@ -67,7 +61,6 @@ run-make/link-path-order/Makefile
 run-make/linkage-attr-on-static/Makefile
 run-make/long-linker-command-lines-cmd-exe/Makefile
 run-make/long-linker-command-lines/Makefile
-run-make/longjmp-across-rust/Makefile
 run-make/lto-linkage-used-attr/Makefile
 run-make/lto-no-link-whole-rlib/Makefile
 run-make/lto-smoke-c/Makefile
@@ -111,7 +104,6 @@ run-make/simd-ffi/Makefile
 run-make/split-debuginfo/Makefile
 run-make/stable-symbol-names/Makefile
 run-make/static-dylib-by-default/Makefile
-run-make/static-extern-type/Makefile
 run-make/staticlib-blank-lib/Makefile
 run-make/staticlib-dylib-linkage/Makefile
 run-make/symbol-mangling-hashed/Makefile

tests/run-make/extern-fn-explicit-align/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// The compiler's rules of alignment for indirectly passed values in a 16-byte aligned argument,
+// in a C external function, used to be arbitrary. Unexpected behavior would occasionally occur
+// and cause memory corruption. This was fixed in #112157, streamlining the way alignment occurs,
+// and this test reproduces the case featured in the issue, checking that it compiles and executes
+// successfully.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80127
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("test");
+    rustc().input("test.rs").run();
+    run("test");
+}

tests/run-make/extern-fn-mangle/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// In this test, the functions foo() and bar() must avoid being mangled, as
+// the external C function depends on them to return the correct sum of 3 + 5 = 8.
+// This test therefore checks that the compiled and executed program respects the
+// #[no_mangle] flags successfully.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/15831
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("test");
+    rustc().input("test.rs").run();
+    run("test");
+}

tests/run-make/extern-fn-slice-no-ice/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// Slices were broken when implicated in foreign-function interface (FFI) with
+// a C library, with something as simple as measuring the length or returning
+// an item at a certain index of a slice would cause an internal compiler error (ICE).
+// This was fixed in #25653, and this test checks that slices in Rust-C FFI can be part
+// of a program that compiles and executes successfully.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/25581
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("test");
+    rustc().input("test.rs").run();
+    run("test");
+}

tests/run-make/extern-fn-struct-passing-abi/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// Functions with more than 6 arguments using foreign function interfaces (FFI) with C libraries
+// would have their arguments unexpectedly swapped, causing unexpected behaviour in Rust-C FFI
+// programs. This test compiles and executes Rust code with bulky functions of up to 7 arguments
+// and uses assertions to check for unexpected swaps.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/25594
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("test");
+    rustc().input("test.rs").run();
+    run("test");
+}

tests/run-make/extern-fn-with-extern-types/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// This test checks the functionality of foreign function interface (FFI) where Rust
+// must call upon a C library defining functions, where these functions also use custom
+// types defined by the C file. In addition to compilation being successful, the binary
+// should also successfully execute.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44295
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("ctest");
+    rustc().input("test.rs").run();
+    run("test");
+}

tests/run-make/extern-fn-with-packed-struct/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// Packed structs, in C, occupy less bytes in memory, but are more
+// vulnerable to alignment errors. Passing them around in a Rust-C foreign
+// function interface (FFI) would cause unexpected behavior, until this was
+// fixed in #16584. This test checks that a Rust program with a C library
+// compiles and executes successfully, even with usage of a packed struct.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/16574
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("test");
+    rustc().input("test.rs").run();
+    run("test");
+}

tests/run-make/longjmp-across-rust/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// longjmp, an error handling function used in C, is useful
+// for jumping out of nested call chains... but it used to accidentally
+// trigger Rust's cleanup system in a way that caused an unexpected abortion
+// of the program. After this was fixed in #48572, this test compiles and executes
+// a program that jumps between Rust and its C library, with longjmp included. For
+// the test to succeed, no unexpected abortion should occur.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48572
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("foo");
+    rustc().input("main.rs").run();
+    run("main");
+}

tests/run-make/static-extern-type/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// Static variables coming from a C library through foreign function interface (FFI) are unsized
+// at compile time - and assuming they are sized used to cause an internal compiler error (ICE).
+// After this was fixed in #58192, this test checks that external statics can be safely used in
+// a program that both compiles and executes successfully.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57876
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{build_native_static_lib, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    build_native_static_lib("define-foo");
+    rustc().arg("-ldefine-foo").input("use-foo.rs").run();
+    run("use-foo");
+}