Test the compile time for llvm#87190

[dianqk]

Test for llvm/llvm-project#87190.

r? ghost

@rustbot label +S-experimental

[dianqk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 3131fe2 with merge 9ad85a7...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 9ad85a7 (9ad85a784d3fd95c25e593da3afb3f4e640e36c3)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (9ad85a7): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - BENCHMARK(S) FAILED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

❗ ❗ ❗ ❗ ❗
Warning ⚠️: The following benchmark(s) failed to build:

• rustc

❗ ❗ ❗ ❗ ❗

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.7%, -0.4%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.7%, -0.4%]	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 9.9%, secondary 4.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	9.9%	[9.9%, 9.9%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.6%	[4.6%, 4.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	9.9%	[9.9%, 9.9%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.9%	[2.9%, 2.9%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.9%	[2.9%, 2.9%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: missing data
Artifact size: 328.74 MiB -> 328.81 MiB (0.02%)