Skip to content

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Jul 4, 2024

fixes #127219

I want to remove all of StructuredDiag, but it's a bit more involved as it is also used from the ItemCtxt, which doesn't support tainting yet.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 4, 2024

r? @petrochenkov

rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 4, 2024
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Jul 4, 2024

r? @estebank as you added that trait

@rustbot rustbot assigned estebank and unassigned petrochenkov Jul 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hahahah what is StructuredDiag, sounds like that should be migrated to Diagnostic asap

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 4, 2024

📌 Commit 0d54fe0 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 4, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123043 (Disable dead variant removal for `#[repr(C)]` enums.)
 - rust-lang#126405 (Migrate some rustc_builtin_macros to SessionDiagnostic)
 - rust-lang#127037 (Remove some duplicated tests)
 - rust-lang#127283 (Reject SmartPointer constructions not serving the purpose)
 - rust-lang#127301 (Tweak some structured suggestions to be more verbose and accurate)
 - rust-lang#127307 (Allow to have different types for arguments of `Rustc::remap_path_prefix`)
 - rust-lang#127309 (jsondocck: add `$FILE` built-in variable)
 - rust-lang#127314 (Trivial update on tidy bless note)
 - rust-lang#127319 (Remove a use of `StructuredDiag`, which is incompatible with automatic error tainting and error translations)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit dd42f7a into rust-lang:master Jul 4, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127319 - oli-obk:fail2taint, r=compiler-errors

Remove a use of `StructuredDiag`, which is incompatible with automatic error tainting and error translations

fixes rust-lang#127219

I want to remove all of `StructuredDiag`, but it's a bit more involved as it is also used from the `ItemCtxt`, which doesn't support tainting yet.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 4, 2024
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

estebank commented Jul 5, 2024

hahahah what is StructuredDiag, sounds like that should be migrated to Diagnostic asap

It predates our current infra by a few years. It was a prototype to have opt-in extended explanations for newcomers. I should have completely removed once it became obvious that that approach wasn't gonna pan out.

@oli-obk oli-obk mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
Remove `StructuredDiag`

follow-up to rust-lang#127319

This trait was an experiment that didn't pan out.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ICE: Size != Size

6 participants