Primitive docs: fix confusing Send
in &T
's list
#119424
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The two lists in this document describe what traits are implemented on references when their underlying
T
also implements them. However, while it is true thatT: Send + Sync
implies&T: Send
(which is what the sentence is trying to explain), it is confusing to haveSend
in the list becauseT: Send
is not needed for that. In particular, the "also require" part may be interpreted as "bothT: Send
andT: Sync
are required".Instead, move
Send
back to where it was before commit 7a47786 ("Makes docs for references a little less confusing"), i.e. to the&mut
list (where no extra nota is needed, i.e. it fits naturally) and move theSync
definition/note to the bottom as something independent.