- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
Implement constant propagation on top of MIR SSA analysis #116012
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            6 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      a03c972
              
                Enable GVN by default.
              
              
                cjgillot 2837727
              
                Replace legacy ConstProp by GVN.
              
              
                cjgillot 75e0824
              
                Bless incremental tests.
              
              
                cjgillot 6dfda0d
              
                Revert codegen test change.
              
              
                cjgillot aa99688
              
                Disable opt in incremental test.
              
              
                cjgillot 6d7f063
              
                Avoid stack overflow in generalizer.
              
              
                cjgillot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you put this onto the top generalizer relate call, in
generalize? Or is the stack overflow due to a really deep type being generated?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a really deep type.
I'm a bit guessing what the stack trace from CI points to. The failing test uses a deep type, and by making it even deeper I got a backtrace pointing involving this recursion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussed this offline. I guess this
ensure_sufficient_stackinvocation is fine.