Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify cryptic comments #115578

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2023
Merged

Clarify cryptic comments #115578

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

ouz-a
Copy link
Contributor

@ouz-a ouz-a commented Sep 5, 2023

Clarifies some unclear comments that lurked in the compiler.

r? @oli-obk

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 5, 2023
Comment on lines 3 to 8
// As a special exemption, `impl Drop` in the return position raises no error.
// This allows a convenient way to return an unnamed drop guard.
// Voldemort here refers to types that are unnameable.
fn voldemort_type() -> impl Drop {
struct Voldemort;
impl Drop for Voldemort {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// As a special exemption, `impl Drop` in the return position raises no error.
// This allows a convenient way to return an unnamed drop guard.
// Voldemort here refers to types that are unnameable.
fn voldemort_type() -> impl Drop {
struct Voldemort;
impl Drop for Voldemort {
// As a special exemption, `impl Drop` in the return position raises no error.
// This allows a convenient way to return an unnamed drop guard.
fn unnameable_type() -> impl Drop {
struct Unnameable;
impl Drop for Unnameable {

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(and the call right below, but i can't suggest changes on that part of the file 😸)

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Sep 6, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 6, 2023

📌 Commit 7928c5f has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 6, 2023
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
Clarify cryptic comments

Clarifies some unclear comments that lurked in the compiler.

r? `@oli-obk`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#114511 (Remove the unhelpful let binding diag comes from FormatArguments)
 - rust-lang#115473 (Add explanatory note to 'expected item' error)
 - rust-lang#115574 (Replace `rustc_data_structures` dependency with `rustc_index` in `rustc_parse_format`)
 - rust-lang#115578 (Clarify cryptic comments)
 - rust-lang#115587 (fix rust-lang#115348)
 - rust-lang#115596 (A small change)
 - rust-lang#115598 (Fix log formatting in bootstrap)
 - rust-lang#115605 (Better Debug for `Ty` in smir)
 - rust-lang#115614 (Fix minor grammar typo)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 93543bc into rust-lang:master Sep 6, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants