Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Dec 8, 2022

Fixes #105404.

I'm not sure happy about this fix but since it's how passes work (ie, even if there are errors, it runs all passes), I think it's fine as is.

Just as a sidenote: I also gave a try to prevent running all passes in case there were compiler errors but then a lot of rustdoc tests were failing so I went for this fix instead.

r? @notriddle

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 8, 2022
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 9, 2022

📌 Commit 183a770 has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 9, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 183a770 with merge b3ddfeb...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: notriddle
Pushing b3ddfeb to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 11, 2022
@bors bors merged commit b3ddfeb into rust-lang:master Dec 11, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 11, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (b3ddfeb): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.8% [1.8%, 5.3%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the prevent-auto-blanket-impl-retrieval branch December 11, 2022 10:38
Aaron1011 pushed a commit to Aaron1011/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
…impl-retrieval, r=notriddle

rustdoc: Prevent auto/blanket impl retrieval if there were compiler errors

Fixes rust-lang#105404.

I'm not sure happy about this fix but since it's how passes work (ie, even if there are errors, it runs all passes), I think it's fine as is.

Just as a sidenote: I also gave a try to prevent running all passes in case there were compiler errors but then a lot of rustdoc tests were failing so I went for this fix instead.

r? `@notriddle`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustdoc: ice: unable to fulfill trait

5 participants