You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Tracking issue for release notes of #149273: Don't leak sysroot crates through dependencies #150531
This issue tracks the release notes text for #149273.
cc @bjorn3, @petrochenkov -- original issue/PR authors and assignees for drafting text
See the forge.rust-lang.org chapter about release notes for an overview of how the release team makes use of these tracking issues.
Release notes text
This section should be edited to specify the correct category(s) for the change, with succinct description(s) of what changed. Some things worth considering:
Does this need an additional compat notes section?
Was this a libs stabilization that should have additional headers to list new APIs under Stabilized APIs and Const Stabilized APIs?
# Compatibility Notes-[Don't leak sysroot crates through dependencies](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/149273)
Tip
Use the previous releases for inspiration on how to write the release notes text and which categories to pick.
Release blog section
If this change is notable enough for inclusion in the blog post then this section should be edited to contain a draft for the blog post. Otherwise leave it empty.
Note
If a blog post section is required the release-blog-post label should be added (@rustbot label +release-blog-post) to this issue as otherwise it may be missed by the release team.
From what I can understand, the compat notes here might be something like
Previously there are situations where when there are multiple crate loading candidates with distinct metadata for the same crate name, we unintentionally picked a resolution even though an ambiguity error should be reported. This is now fixed in #149273.
I think this change is not observable on stable. We already handled everything correctly for --extern dependencies and the sysroot doesn't contain duplicates for any non-rustc_private crate.
Activity
jieyouxu commentedon Dec 31, 2025
From what I can understand, the compat notes here might be something like
cc @petrochenkov @bjorn3 does that description seem accurate to you?
bjorn3 commentedon Dec 31, 2025
I think this change is not observable on stable. We already handled everything correctly for
--externdependencies and the sysroot doesn't contain duplicates for any non-rustc_private crate.jieyouxu commentedon Dec 31, 2025
Ah. Maybe I'm just misunderstanding 👍
EDIT: context was #t-release > Crater runs for 1.93 #149833 @ 💬