Skip to content

Meta: Require MCP and relevant team nominations for adding (ecosystem, custom codegen backend) testing jobs that would block PR/Merge CI and require documenting failure protocol #137960

Open
@jieyouxu

Description

@jieyouxu

Note: This is intended to be an approximation to cross-team MCPs1.

I'm proposing a new rust-lang/rust policy (it's drafted as a compiler MCP but with multiple team nominations) that we require MCP and relevant team nominations for adding (ecosystem, custom codegen backend) testing jobs that would block PR/Merge CI and require documenting failure protocol.

Please let me know if nominated relevant teams have suggestions, concerns or other feedback.

There's no I-{team}-nominated labels for some teams, so I'll have to do it manually (sorry):

  • cc @rust-lang/rustdoc
  • cc @rust-lang/bootstrap
  • cc @rust-lang/infra

Footnotes

  1. https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/486433-all-hands-2025/topic/Project-scope.20MCP

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    A-metaArea: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itselfC-discussionCategory: Discussion or questions that doesn't represent real issues.T-bootstrapRelevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)T-infraRelevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions