Open
Description
openedon Feb 18, 2023
Consider following code:
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
struct Foo([u32; 4]);
const fn bar() {
const ONE: Foo = Foo([1, 0, 0, 0]);
match Foo([0, 0, 0, 0]) {
ONE => unreachable!(),
_ => {},
}
if ONE == Foo([0, 0, 0, 0]) {
unreachable!()
}
}
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=f2b2c2421583fbb47472f8e8746b394f
It fails with "the trait PartialEq<_>
is implemented for Foo
, but that implementation is not const
".
But if we do add a const implementation:
#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
#[derive(Debug, Eq)]
struct Foo([u32; 4]);
impl const PartialEq for Foo {
fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
self.0[0] == other.0[0]
&& self.0[1] == other.0[1]
&& self.0[2] == other.0[2]
&& self.0[3] == other.0[3]
}
}
const fn bar() {
const ONE: Foo = Foo([1, 0, 0, 0]);
match Foo([0, 0, 0, 0]) {
ONE => unreachable!(),
_ => {},
}
if ONE == Foo([0, 0, 0, 0]) {
unreachable!()
}
}
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=a980e3ab7d72b9545886de5547cf4963
then it fails with "to use a constant of type Foo
in a pattern, Foo
must be annotated with `#[derive]"
So we found ourselves between rock and hard place where we have to choose between using pattern matching and equality.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Area: const fn foo(..) {..}. Pure functions which can be applied at compile time.Area: const fn foo(..) {..}. Pure functions which can be applied at compile time.Relating to patterns and pattern matchingRelating to patterns and pattern matching