Skip to content

Refactor: Remove utils::opt_def_id #3860

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2019

Conversation

phansch
Copy link
Member

@phansch phansch commented Mar 8, 2019

This removes some indirection. Probably this method was uplifted to
rustc at some point?

This removes some indirection. Probably this method was uplifted to
rustc at some point?
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Mar 9, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2019

📌 Commit 9d97ed6 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 9d97ed6 with merge 7358df0...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2019
Refactor: Remove utils::opt_def_id

This removes some indirection. Probably this method was uplifted to
rustc at some point?
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Mar 9, 2019

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 9d97ed6 with merge ccfbfb8...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2019
Refactor: Remove utils::opt_def_id

This removes some indirection. Probably this method was uplifted to
rustc at some point?
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing ccfbfb8 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9d97ed6 into rust-lang:master Mar 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants