New lints iter_filter_is_some and iter_filter_is_ok#11990
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @Jarcho (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Adds a pair of lints that check for cases of an iterator over `Result` and `Option` followed by `filter` without being followed by `map` as that is covered already by a different, specialized lint. changelog: New Lint: [`iter_filter_is_some`] changelog: New Lint: [`iter_filter_is_ok`]
ghost
closed this by deleting the head repository
This pull request was closed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a pair of lints that check for cases of an iterator over
ResultandOptionfollowed byfilterwithout being followed bymapas that is covered already by a different, specialized lint.changelog: New Lint: [
iter_filter_is_some]changelog: New Lint: [
iter_filter_is_ok]Fixes #11843
PS, I also made some minor documentations fixes in a case where a double tick (`) was included.