Skip to content

Remove dead code in needless_pass_by_value #10944

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Jun 13, 2023

The spans_need_deref is never used so I removed it alongside all linked code as well.

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 13, 2023

r? @xFrednet

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 13, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez force-pushed the cleanup-needless-pass-by-value branch from d4f7e6b to bcaf655 Compare June 13, 2023 15:08
@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

LGTM, would be interesting, how that evolved, but oh well. Thank you for the PR :)

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 13, 2023

📌 Commit bcaf655 has been approved by xFrednet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 13, 2023

⌛ Testing commit bcaf655 with merge 72332b2...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 13, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: xFrednet
Pushing 72332b2 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 72332b2 into rust-lang:master Jun 13, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the cleanup-needless-pass-by-value branch June 13, 2023 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants