Closed
Description
Summary
If f()
is too expensive to compute eagerly, then of course f() + 1
must be too. However x.unwrap_or(f())
triggers or_fun_call
, but x.unwrap_or(f() + 1)
does not.
Lint Name
or_fun_call
Reproducer
I tried this code:
pub fn foo(f: fn() -> i32, x: Option<i32>) -> (i32, i32) {
let b = x.unwrap_or(f());
let c = x.unwrap_or(f() + 1);
(b, c)
}
clippy-driver --crate-type lib foo.rs -W clippy::or_fun_call`
I expected to see this happen:
Two similar errors.
Instead, this happened:
warning: use of `unwrap_or` followed by a function call
--> foo.rs:2:15
|
2 | let b = x.unwrap_or(f());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `unwrap_or_else(f)`
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#or_fun_call
= note: requested on the command line with `-W clippy::or-fun-call`
warning: 1 warning emitted
Version
rustc 1.81.0-nightly (684b3553f 2024-06-20)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: 684b3553f70148ded97a80371c2405984d4f6aa7
commit-date: 2024-06-20
host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
release: 1.81.0-nightly
LLVM version: 18.1.7