Skip to content

Conversation

@Veykril
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril commented Apr 28, 2023

No description provided.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 28, 2023
@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Apr 28, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

📌 Commit 461f4fb has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 461f4fb with merge 18e27ac...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
fix: Fix proc-macro-srv path config not working
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Apr 28, 2023

Is there some way to test this so it doesn't regress in the future?

@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Apr 28, 2023

Is there some way to test this so it doesn't regress in the future?

certainly, added some tests for the config

@Veykril Veykril force-pushed the proc-macro-srv-conf branch from 461f4fb to 3b97978 Compare April 28, 2023 19:18
@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Apr 28, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

📌 Commit 3b97978 has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 3b97978 with merge 3ad835f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing 3ad835f to master...

@bors bors merged commit 3ad835f into rust-lang:master Apr 28, 2023
@Veykril Veykril deleted the proc-macro-srv-conf branch April 28, 2023 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants