Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mergeable rustdoc cross-crate info #3662
Mergeable rustdoc cross-crate info #3662
Changes from 1 commit
542dcbb
fdc1b70
8c78a93
08ac8a2
ef10ed5
4994251
0f01c9b
7db0a4a
23e34e0
97cf6c6
3326b10
cbd62bb
eba7fc4
7b82ab9
63107f9
3d0dd8c
0ddbcf6
f639365
627a0ba
b0dc37d
4b076f6
d7ea3b5
628c7a9
c765097
ac9208c
e66bb63
665a58f
e1b5e5b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we plan to deprecate
--merge=shared
anyway, what do you think about not adding it in the first place?--merge
already has to be an optional flag to avoid breaking changes.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Uniformity and ease of documentation. It's the same reason you're allowed to write
edition = 2015
, even though that's the default if you don't specify anything.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough. I guess we won't ever be able to remove the shared implementation anyway, so it doesn't matter. And if we somehow did find a way to remove it while maintaining the outward behavior, that wouldn't be a breaking change anyway since it's an implementation detail.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you say we won't ever be able to remove the shared implementation? I've been assuming that after updating Cargo and docs.rs, and providing a decently long deprecation period we could remove it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I'm trying to remember what I was thinking ^^. I think I was worried that there might be existing build systems or other tools that were depending on the shared representation, but we never guaranteed stability of it. So perhaps it would be fine to remove after all.