Skip to content

Meta-RFC: An RFC to end all RFCs #2381

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Apr 1, 2018

🖼️ Rendered

📝 Summary

This RFC ends the quaint process of RFCs and begins the appointment process,
by referanda, of a benevolent dictator for life.

💖 Thanks

To the future BDFL, who is without flaws.

@Centril Centril added the T-core Relevant to the core team, which will review and decide on the RFC. label Apr 1, 2018
is ineffective, slow, and leads to bad decisions.

Instead, we clearly need a strong leader who can make the
`Result<RightThing™, E>`s happen and unify all `E`s with `!`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Worth noting that this BDFL would need to make their first action be to make a valid part of a Rust identifier in order to make this happen.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, sadly, the consensus process has been ineffective in that department!

Not even with #![feature(non_ascii_idents)] can we have s in our identifiers. Rust is clearly not production ready since companies can't put ™s in their identifiers.

error: unknown start of token: \u{2122}
 --> src/main.rs:3:18
  |
3 | struct RightThing™;
  |                  ^

@killercup
Copy link
Member

killercup commented Apr 1, 2018

And it was as it was prophesied

Fo̶r̴ w̛he͏n t̡h͝e f͟olļower͠s ơf̨ ͡the C̡rab ̡sh̵ed̵ the̢ir̸ ̵C͞ ̷t̸o ͟p͢r͝o̷c͘la͏im ͜t̶h͏em͝s̡e̵lve̵s͢ Rus̸t͝ác̀ȩan͞s,̶ ҉t̵hr̷e͏e ͟E͟a̴rt̢h ̕r̡e͝vo̷lu̢tions ̀ar̵e t̶o͞ ͟p͘as̛s a͏fter ҉the ̛beg͡i͟n͝n̸i̕n͠g of ́the͝ prǫsp͞er͢ou̶s͠ ̕age͢ o̸f͢ ̀st͟ab͢ili̶t̀y̧ ̢b̢e͡f́or͏e҉ t̴h̵e Al̴migh͝t͠y Ju̴dge͘ of A̵ll͟ ̸P͏Rs̀ ҉s̷hall̸ r҉i͞s͘e ͠f͟r̢o̧m ͜t͠hè ͜buil̷dbo͘t's p̀it ͘a͏n̨d ͢st̕ri̶k͞e do̢wn͘ ́a͞l̕l͡ w͞ho s͟tand ̕i͏n th͟e wa̧y̸ ͢of coh̛e͘s͠io͝n͝, cor͏ro͘s͘i҉on,̧ a͘nd c̨o͘n͏s̕e͢n̵su̸s ̸a͟nd͜ ̶mer͞g͏e ̡a wa͝y̢ i͜n͟t͡ò th҉e fu͡t̕ure ̸d̷e̴f͝i̢n̕ed by͢ O͝ur Ben̵evo͡len̢t̀ ́D̵i̸c̴t͞a͠t̶o̴r ͜f̛or҉ L̨if̛e͡, ̢@̕b̨órs!͟

# Unresolved questions
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions

- The title of the BDFL is up for bikeshedding.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty sure that the title gets decided by the BDFL

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thy resolve be steadfast. Might ye be our BDFL, sire?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only if we drop the B

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The beauty of being a dictator for life; Once you are the dictator you can drop and add as many Bs, or other letters in front as you like!

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Apr 2, 2018

The BDFL came back from the future and ordered me to close this PR.

@Centril Centril closed this Apr 2, 2018
@Centril Centril added april-1st RFCs started on the 1st of april. and removed april-1st RFCs started on the 1st of april. labels Apr 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
april-1st RFCs started on the 1st of april. T-core Relevant to the core team, which will review and decide on the RFC.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants