Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bury Error::description() #2230

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 3, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
48 changes: 48 additions & 0 deletions 0000-bury-description.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
- Feature Name: optional_error_description
- Start Date: 2017-11-29
- RFC PR: (leave this empty)
- Rust Issue: (leave this empty)

# Default implementation of `Error::description()`
[summary]: #summary

Provide a default implementation of the `Error` trait's `description()` method to save users trouble of implementing this flawed method.

# Motivation
[motivation]: #motivation

The `description()` method is a waste of time for implementors and users of the `Error` trait. There's high overlap between description and `Display`, which creates redundant implementation work and confusion about relationship of these two ways of displaying the error.

The `description()` method can't easily return a formatted string with per-instance error description. That's a gotcha for novice users struggling with the borrow checker, and gotcha for users trying to display the error, because the `description()` is going to return a less informative message than the `Display` trait.

# Guide-level explanation
[guide-level-explanation]: #guide-level-explanation

Let's steer users away from the `description()` method.

1. Change the `description()` documentation to suggest use of the `Display` trait instead.
2. Provide a default implementation of the `description()` so that the `Error` trait can be implemented without worrying about this method.

# Reference-level explanation
[reference-level-explanation]: #reference-level-explanation

Users of the `Error` trait can then pretend this method does not exist.

# Drawbacks
[drawbacks]: #drawbacks

When users start omitting bespoke `description()` implementations, code that still uses this method will start getting default strings instead of human-written description. If this becomes a problem, the `description()` method can also be formally deprecated (with the `#[deprecated]` attribute). However, there's no urgency to remove existing implementations of `description()`, so this RFC does not propose formal deprecation at this time to avoid unnecessary warnings during the transition.

# Rationale and alternatives
[alternatives]: #alternatives

- Do nothing, and rely on 3rd party crates to improve usability of errors (e.g. various crates providing `Error`-implementing macros or the `Fail` trait).
- The default message returned by `description` could be different.
- it could be a hardcoded generic string, e.g. `"error"`,
- it could return `core::intrinsics::type_name::<Self>()`,
- it could try to be nicer, e.g. use the type's doccomment as the description, or convert type name to a sentence (`FileNotFoundError` -> "error: file not found").

# Unresolved questions
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions

None yet.