Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 30, 2020. It is now read-only.

Add links to PGP signatures. Fixes #594. #599

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add links to PGP signatures. Fixes #594. #599

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

udan11
Copy link
Contributor

@udan11 udan11 commented Oct 24, 2016

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @brson (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Nov 3, 2016

While I think this is useful information to expose, I'm not sure the best way to do it.

If we were to do this I think we need more than just links that say "PGP". What is a user supposed to do with these files? We at least would need to indicate what their purpose is, how to use them, where the key is, how to validate the key , etc.

Adding these links doubles the number of links on the page for something almost nobody is going to use.

When we promote rustup.rs to be the main installation method I anticipate the installation options requiring a lot more explanation sadly, so it may make sense to think how to integrate this stuff then. I expect that the install.html page will be the dead-simple installation instructions ala https://www.rustup.rs, and having another page for other installation methods. That page will necessarily have explanation of the differences between install methods, so it could make sense to explain "if you want to validate that your binaries are the same that the Rust project release then ...".

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Dec 1, 2016

This is superceded by #621. Thank you @udan11 !

@brson brson closed this Dec 1, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants