Automatic Rustup

Cargo.toml

@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ native-lib = ["dep:libffi", "dep:libloading", "dep:capstone", "dep:ipc-channel",
 
 [lints.rust.unexpected_cfgs]
 level = "warn"
+check-cfg = ['cfg(bootstrap)']
 
 # Be aware that this file is inside a workspace when used via the
 # submodule in the rustc repo. That means there are many cargo features

rust-version

@@ -1 +1 @@
-425a9c0a0e365c0b8c6cfd00c2ded83a73bed9a0
+f605b57042ffeb320d7ae44490113a827139b766

src/lib.rs

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+#![cfg_attr(bootstrap, feature(strict_overflow_ops))]
 #![feature(abort_unwind)]
 #![feature(cfg_select)]
 #![feature(rustc_private)]

src/machine.rs

@@ -1111,6 +1111,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Machine<'tcx> for MiriMachine<'tcx> {
     ) -> InterpResult<'tcx, Option<(&'tcx mir::Body<'tcx>, ty::Instance<'tcx>)>> {
         // For foreign items, try to see if we can emulate them.
         if ecx.tcx.is_foreign_item(instance.def_id()) {
+            let _trace = enter_trace_span!("emulate_foreign_item");
             // An external function call that does not have a MIR body. We either find MIR elsewhere
             // or emulate its effect.
             // This will be Ok(None) if we're emulating the intrinsic entirely within Miri (no need
@@ -1123,6 +1124,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Machine<'tcx> for MiriMachine<'tcx> {
         }
 
         // Otherwise, load the MIR.
+        let _trace = enter_trace_span!("load_mir");
         interp_ok(Some((ecx.load_mir(instance.def, None)?, instance)))
     }
 

src/shims/foreign_items.rs

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ pub trait EvalContextExt<'tcx>: crate::MiriInterpCxExt<'tcx> {
                         return interp_ok(());
                     }
                     // Skip over items without an explicitly defined symbol name.
-                    if !(attrs.export_name.is_some()
+                    if !(attrs.symbol_name.is_some()
                         || attrs.flags.contains(CodegenFnAttrFlags::NO_MANGLE)
                         || attrs.flags.contains(CodegenFnAttrFlags::RUSTC_STD_INTERNAL_SYMBOL))
                     {

tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+//@revisions: stack tree
+//@[tree]compile-flags: -Zmiri-tree-borrows
+// Validation forces more things into memory, which we can't have here.
+//@compile-flags: -Zmiri-disable-validation
+#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics)]
+use std::intrinsics::mir::*;
+
+pub struct S(i32);
+
+#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "optimized")]
+fn main() {
+    mir! {
+        let _unit: ();
+        {
+            let staging = S(42); // This forces `staging` into memory...
+            let non_copy = staging; // ... so we move it to a non-inmemory local here.
+            // This specifically uses a type with scalar representation to tempt Miri to use the
+            // efficient way of storing local variables (outside adressable memory).
+            Call(_unit = callee(Move(non_copy), Move(non_copy)), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+            //~[stack]^ ERROR: not granting access
+            //~[tree]| ERROR: /read access .* forbidden/
+        }
+        after_call = {
+            Return()
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+pub fn callee(x: S, mut y: S) {
+    // With the setup above, if `x` and `y` are both moved,
+    // then writing to `y` will change the value stored in `x`!
+    y.0 = 0;
+    assert_eq!(x.0, 42);
+}

tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.stack.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+error: Undefined Behavior: not granting access to tag <TAG> because that would remove [Unique for <TAG>] which is strongly protected
+  --> tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+   |
+LL |             Call(_unit = callee(Move(non_copy), Move(non_copy)), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Undefined Behavior occurred here
+   |
+   = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
+   = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
+help: <TAG> was created here, as the root tag for ALLOC
+  --> tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+   |
+LL |             Call(_unit = callee(Move(non_copy), Move(non_copy)), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+help: <TAG> is this argument
+  --> tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+   |
+LL |     y.0 = 0;
+   |     ^^^^^^^
+   = note: BACKTRACE (of the first span):
+   = note: inside `main` at tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+
+note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace
+
+error: aborting due to 1 previous error
+

tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.tree.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+error: Undefined Behavior: read access through <TAG> (root of the allocation) at ALLOC[0x0] is forbidden
+  --> tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+   |
+LL |             Call(_unit = callee(Move(non_copy), Move(non_copy)), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Undefined Behavior occurred here
+   |
+   = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Tree Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
+   = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/tree-borrows.md for further information
+   = help: the accessed tag <TAG> (root of the allocation) is foreign to the protected tag <TAG> (i.e., it is not a child)
+   = help: this foreign read access would cause the protected tag <TAG> (currently Active) to become Disabled
+   = help: protected tags must never be Disabled
+help: the accessed tag <TAG> was created here
+  --> tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+   |
+LL |             Call(_unit = callee(Move(non_copy), Move(non_copy)), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+help: the protected tag <TAG> was created here, in the initial state Reserved
+  --> tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+   |
+LL |     y.0 = 0;
+   |     ^^^^^^^
+help: the protected tag <TAG> later transitioned to Active due to a child write access at offsets [0x0..0x4]
+  --> tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+   |
+LL |     y.0 = 0;
+   |     ^^^^^^^
+   = help: this transition corresponds to the first write to a 2-phase borrowed mutable reference
+   = note: BACKTRACE (of the first span):
+   = note: inside `main` at tests/fail/function_calls/arg_inplace_locals_alias.rs:LL:CC
+
+note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace
+
+error: aborting due to 1 previous error
+

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.none.stderr

@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ LL |     unsafe { ptr.read() };
 note: inside `main`
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.rs:LL:CC
    |
-LL |             Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
-   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+LL |             Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
 Uninitialized memory occurred at ALLOC[0x0..0x4], in this allocation:
 ALLOC (stack variable, size: 4, align: 4) {

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.rs

@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ use std::intrinsics::mir::*;
 pub fn main() {
     mir! {
         {
-            let x = 0;
-            let ptr = &raw mut x;
+            let _x = 0;
+            let ptr = &raw mut _x;
             // We arrange for `myfun` to have a pointer that aliases
             // its return place. Even just reading from that pointer is UB.
-            Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+            Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
         }
 
         after_call = {
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ pub fn main() {
 
 fn myfun(ptr: *mut i32) -> i32 {
     unsafe { ptr.read() };
-    //~[stack]^ ERROR: not granting access
+    //~[stack]^ ERROR: does not exist in the borrow stack
     //~[tree]| ERROR: /read access .* forbidden/
     //~[none]| ERROR: uninitialized
     // Without an aliasing model, reads are "fine" but at least they return uninit data.

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.stack.stderr

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-error: Undefined Behavior: not granting access to tag <TAG> because that would remove [Unique for <TAG>] which is strongly protected
+error: Undefined Behavior: attempting a read access using <TAG> at ALLOC[0x0], but that tag does not exist in the borrow stack for this location
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.rs:LL:CC
    |
 LL |     unsafe { ptr.read() };
-   |              ^^^^^^^^^^ Undefined Behavior occurred here
+   |              ^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of an access at ALLOC[0x0..0x4]
    |
    = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
    = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
@@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ help: <TAG> was created by a SharedReadWrite retag at offsets [0x0..0x4]
    |
 LL | /     mir! {
 LL | |         {
-LL | |             let x = 0;
-LL | |             let ptr = &raw mut x;
+LL | |             let _x = 0;
+LL | |             let ptr = &raw mut _x;
 ...  |
 LL | |     }
    | |_____^
-help: <TAG> is this argument
+help: <TAG> was later invalidated at offsets [0x0..0x4] by a Unique in-place function argument/return passing protection
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.rs:LL:CC
    |
 LL |     unsafe { ptr.read() };
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ LL |     unsafe { ptr.read() };
 note: inside `main`
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.rs:LL:CC
    |
-LL |             Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
-   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+LL |             Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = note: this error originates in the macro `::core::intrinsics::mir::__internal_remove_let` which comes from the expansion of the macro `mir` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
 
 note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.tree.stderr

@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ help: the accessed tag <TAG> was created here
    |
 LL | /     mir! {
 LL | |         {
-LL | |             let x = 0;
-LL | |             let ptr = &raw mut x;
+LL | |             let _x = 0;
+LL | |             let ptr = &raw mut _x;
 ...  |
 LL | |     }
    | |_____^
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ LL |     unsafe { ptr.read() };
 note: inside `main`
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_read.rs:LL:CC
    |
-LL |             Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
-   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+LL |             Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = note: this error originates in the macro `::core::intrinsics::mir::__internal_remove_let` which comes from the expansion of the macro `mir` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
 
 note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write.rs

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ pub fn main() {
             let ptr = &raw mut _x;
             // We arrange for `myfun` to have a pointer that aliases
             // its return place. Writing to that pointer is UB.
-            Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+            Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
         }
 
         after_call = {
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ pub fn main() {
 fn myfun(ptr: *mut i32) -> i32 {
     // This overwrites the return place, which shouldn't be possible through another pointer.
     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
-    //~[stack]^ ERROR: strongly protected
+    //~[stack]^ ERROR: does not exist in the borrow stack
     //~[tree]| ERROR: /write access .* forbidden/
     13
 }

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write.stack.stderr

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-error: Undefined Behavior: not granting access to tag <TAG> because that would remove [Unique for <TAG>] which is strongly protected
+error: Undefined Behavior: attempting a write access using <TAG> at ALLOC[0x0], but that tag does not exist in the borrow stack for this location
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write.rs:LL:CC
    |
 LL |     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
-   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Undefined Behavior occurred here
+   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of an access at ALLOC[0x0..0x4]
    |
    = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
    = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ LL | |             let ptr = &raw mut _x;
 ...  |
 LL | |     }
    | |_____^
-help: <TAG> is this argument
+help: <TAG> was later invalidated at offsets [0x0..0x4] by a Unique in-place function argument/return passing protection
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write.rs:LL:CC
    |
 LL |     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ LL |     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
 note: inside `main`
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write.rs:LL:CC
    |
-LL |             Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
-   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+LL |             Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = note: this error originates in the macro `::core::intrinsics::mir::__internal_remove_let` which comes from the expansion of the macro `mir` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
 
 note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write.tree.stderr

@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ LL |     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
 note: inside `main`
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write.rs:LL:CC
    |
-LL |             Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
-   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+LL |             Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = note: this error originates in the macro `::core::intrinsics::mir::__internal_remove_let` which comes from the expansion of the macro `mir` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
 
 note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write_tail_call.rs

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ pub fn main() {
             let ptr = &raw mut _x;
             // We arrange for `myfun` to have a pointer that aliases
             // its return place. Writing to that pointer is UB.
-            Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+            Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
         }
 
         after_call = {
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ fn myfun(ptr: *mut i32) -> i32 {
 fn myfun2(ptr: *mut i32) -> i32 {
     // This overwrites the return place, which shouldn't be possible through another pointer.
     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
-    //~[stack]^ ERROR: strongly protected
+    //~[stack]^ ERROR: does not exist in the borrow stack
     //~[tree]| ERROR: /write access .* forbidden/
     13
 }

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write_tail_call.stack.stderr

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-error: Undefined Behavior: not granting access to tag <TAG> because that would remove [Unique for <TAG>] which is strongly protected
+error: Undefined Behavior: attempting a write access using <TAG> at ALLOC[0x0], but that tag does not exist in the borrow stack for this location
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write_tail_call.rs:LL:CC
    |
 LL |     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
-   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Undefined Behavior occurred here
+   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of an access at ALLOC[0x0..0x4]
    |
    = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
    = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
@@ -16,18 +16,18 @@ LL | |             let ptr = &raw mut _x;
 ...  |
 LL | |     }
    | |_____^
-help: <TAG> is this argument
+help: <TAG> was later invalidated at offsets [0x0..0x4] by a Unique in-place function argument/return passing protection
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write_tail_call.rs:LL:CC
    |
-LL |     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
-   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+LL |     become myfun2(ptr)
+   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = note: BACKTRACE (of the first span):
    = note: inside `myfun2` at tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write_tail_call.rs:LL:CC
 note: inside `main`
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write_tail_call.rs:LL:CC
    |
-LL |             Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
-   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+LL |             Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = note: this error originates in the macro `::core::intrinsics::mir::__internal_remove_let` which comes from the expansion of the macro `mir` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
 
 note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace

tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write_tail_call.tree.stderr

@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ LL |     unsafe { ptr.write(0) };
 note: inside `main`
   --> tests/fail/function_calls/return_pointer_aliasing_write_tail_call.rs:LL:CC
    |
-LL |             Call(*ptr = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
-   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+LL |             Call(_x = myfun(ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    = note: this error originates in the macro `::core::intrinsics::mir::__internal_remove_let` which comes from the expansion of the macro `mir` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
 
 note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace