Add additional fields to statx

[Thomasdezeeuw]

Description

Updates statx to include all fields as of Linux v6.16.

Sources

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/038d61fd642278bab63ee8ef722c50d10ab01e8f/include/uapi/linux/stat.h#L99-L193

Checklist

• Relevant tests in libc-test/semver have been updated
• No placeholder or unstable values like *LAST or *MAX are
  included (see #3131)
• Tested locally (cd libc-test && cargo test --target mytarget);
  especially relevant for platforms that may not be checked in CI

@rustbot label +stable-nominated

[Thomasdezeeuw]

The CI failure is a Clippy complaints about code I didn't change:

error: this `if` statement can be collapsed
   --> ctest-next/src/translator.rs:221:9
    |
221 | /         if let syn::PathArguments::AngleBracketed(args) = &last.arguments {
222 | |             if let syn::GenericArgument::Type(inner_ty) = args.args.first().unwrap() {
223 | |                 // Option<T> is ONLY ffi-safe if it contains a function pointer, or a reference.
224 | |                 match inner_ty {
...   |
237 | |         }
    | |_________^
    |
    = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#collapsible_if
    = note: `-D clippy::collapsible-if` implied by `-D warnings`
    = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::collapsible_if)]`
help: collapse nested if block
    |
221 ~         if let syn::PathArguments::AngleBracketed(args) = &last.arguments
222 ~             && let syn::GenericArgument::Type(inner_ty) = args.args.first().unwrap() {
223 |                 // Option<T> is ONLY ffi-safe if it contains a function pointer, or a reference.
...
235 |                 }
236 ~             }
    |

error: could not compile `ctest-next` (lib) due to 1 previous error

If the maintainers want I can send a pr for this, but I don't think it should be done in this pr.

[tgross35]

These haven't yet been updated in glibc https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/a6eb8285d9bfb7ec0875b85ca356e833ff964d4f/io/bits/types/struct_statx.h#L30 or musl, so we should wait for that.

@rustbot blocked

The CI failure is a Clippy complaints about code I didn't change:

That has been fixed, should go away with a rebase

[tgross35]

For reference, here's the glibc patchset adding this https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20251003194707.2326679-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org/

[Thomasdezeeuw]

@tgross35 it seems like the patchset was merged: https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/bd569425330c6f5644c232b4b253e9ab905fcdba/io/bits/types/struct_statx.h#L56-L62. Are there any requirements in terms of release/deployment of the glibc changes (i.e. a minimum version)? Or should I rebase and it's good to merge?

[tgross35]

@tgross35 it seems like the patchset was merged: https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/bd569425330c6f5644c232b4b253e9ab905fcdba/io/bits/types/struct_statx.h#L56-L62. Are there any requirements in terms of release/deployment of the glibc changes (i.e. a minimum version)? Or should I rebase and it's good to merge?

Thanks for the update, nope that's about it. I'll merge after rebase and CI passing 👍

(Note you may need to skip these fields in libc-test/build.rs)

[rustbot]

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

[Thomasdezeeuw]

Rebased and added the padding.