Add os_unfair_lock signatures/primitives #2918
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Amanieu (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
CI failed, does it pass on your end? If so that means our CI image is old and we could skip the test for them. |
| @@ -1295,6 +1297,10 @@ s_no_extra_traits! { | |||
| pub l2p_contigbytes: ::off_t, | |||
| pub l2p_devoffset: ::off_t, | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| pub struct os_unfair_lock { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
actually os_unfair_lock is an alias of struct os_unfair_lock_s in reality.
the os_unfair api is available since sierra (10.12) if that helps. |
|
Sorry for the late response, I haven't been able to gain access to a macOS machine that isn't horribly out of date yet. It may be a while before I can. |
|
No worries, I've finished up the bindings for you (tired of defining this in local |
This pull request resolves #2917 by adding bindings to the
os_unfair_lockAPI found in Apple operating systems. I've added the following code:os_unfair_lock, which is an opaque, 32-bit structure.os_unfair_lock_t, which is a mutable pointer to anos_unfair_lock.OS_UNFAIR_LOCK_INIT, which just initializes a lock to zero.os_unfair_lock_lock,os_unfair_lock_trylock,os_unfair_lock_unlock,os_unfair_lock_assert_ownerandos_unfair_lock_assert_not_owner, which are based on the signatures they have here.This is my first time opening a PR here! I'm excited, but let me know if I've missed anything.