document Rust 1.89 #579
document Rust 1.89 #579
Conversation
|
@PLeVasseur, @nikomatsakis, any thoughts? |
tshepang
force-pushed
the
tshepang/document-1.89
branch
from
95d0b7b to
524cb77
Compare
Co-authored-by: Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
Can be used outside of functions:
const X: [u8; 1] = {
let x: [u8; _] = [0; _];
x
};
tshepang
force-pushed
the
tshepang/document-1.89
branch
from
524cb77 to
318a2f8
Compare
|
reviews addressed... |
|
reviews addressed... |
|
also made an attempt at a definition |
| * :dp:`fls_eeaJtK4w5gVK` | ||
| The :t:`[argument operand]s` of an extending :t:`call expression` | ||
| of a :t:`tuple struct` or a :t:`tuple enum variant`. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This might be correct in the Reference, but I don't think this verbiage matches the style and structure here. The FLS doesn't say "the X of an extending Y expression". It says "the X of an Y expression that is an extending expression". This makes sense in the context of how the FLS is tying things back to the defined term "extending expression".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, do you think that "call expression of a tuple struct" is a clear enough way to describe a call expression where the call operand corresponds to the value namespace constructor for a tuple struct? The "of" there reads a bit odd to me. The glossary entry for "tuple struct call expression" defines it in terms of a "call expression where the call operand resolves to a tuple struct", and something like that sounds much clearer.
tshepang
force-pushed
the
tshepang/document-1.89
branch
from
07e74e4 to
27d3a35
Compare
|
Looks good. Thanks @tshepang. |
No description provided.