Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support glob syntax in workspace members #3979

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 16, 2017
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
26 changes: 24 additions & 2 deletions src/cargo/core/workspace.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ use std::collections::BTreeMap;
use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};
use std::slice;

use glob::glob;

use core::{Package, VirtualManifest, EitherManifest, SourceId};
use core::{PackageIdSpec, Dependency, Profile, Profiles};
use ops;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -316,9 +318,16 @@ impl<'cfg> Workspace<'cfg> {
};

if let Some(list) = members {
let root = root_manifest.parent().unwrap();

let mut expanded_list = Vec::new();
for path in list {
let root = root_manifest.parent().unwrap();
let manifest_path = root.join(path).join("Cargo.toml");
let expanded_paths = expand_member_path(&path, root)?;
expanded_list.extend(expanded_paths);
}

for path in expanded_list {
let manifest_path = path.join("Cargo.toml");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this error if there's a path without Cargo.toml matched by the glob? I would say that it's OK to bail in this case, but that just skipping that path would be probably more useful: I often have various assorted folders alongside the workspace packages.

In any case, I think a test case for this would be useful :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call out. I will get on it.

self.find_path_deps(&manifest_path, &root_manifest, false)?;
}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -527,6 +536,19 @@ impl<'cfg> Workspace<'cfg> {
}
}

fn expand_member_path(member_path: &str, root_path: &Path) -> CargoResult<Vec<PathBuf>> {
let path = root_path.join(member_path);
let path = path.to_str().unwrap();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could the None case be handled here instead of unwrap? (returning an empty Vec)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

let res = glob(path).map_err(|e| {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could this use .chain_error instead of .map_err?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I may be missing something here, but I don't see how .chain_error can be used with Result<glob::Paths, glob::PatternError>.

human(format!("could not parse pattern `{}`: {}", &path, e))
})?;
res.map(|p| {
p.or_else(|e| {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As above, could this use chain_error?

Err(human(format!("unable to match path to pattern `{}`: {}", &path, e)))
})
}).collect()
}

fn is_excluded(members: &Option<Vec<String>>,
exclude: &[String],
root_path: &Path,
Expand Down
64 changes: 64 additions & 0 deletions tests/workspaces.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1378,3 +1378,67 @@ fn exclude_but_also_depend() {
execs().with_status(0));
assert_that(&p.root().join("foo/bar/target"), existing_dir());
}

#[test]
fn glob_syntax() {
let p = project("foo")
.file("Cargo.toml", r#"
[project]
name = "foo"
version = "0.1.0"
authors = []

[workspace]
members = ["crates/*"]
exclude = ["crates/qux"]
"#)
.file("src/main.rs", "fn main() {}")
.file("crates/bar/Cargo.toml", r#"
[project]
name = "bar"
version = "0.1.0"
authors = []
workspace = "../.."
"#)
.file("crates/bar/src/main.rs", "fn main() {}")
.file("crates/baz/Cargo.toml", r#"
[project]
name = "baz"
version = "0.1.0"
authors = []
workspace = "../.."
"#)
.file("crates/baz/src/main.rs", "fn main() {}")
.file("crates/qux/Cargo.toml", r#"
[project]
name = "qux"
version = "0.1.0"
authors = []
"#)
.file("crates/qux/src/main.rs", "fn main() {}");
p.build();

assert_that(p.cargo("build"), execs().with_status(0));
assert_that(&p.bin("foo"), existing_file());
assert_that(&p.bin("bar"), is_not(existing_file()));
assert_that(&p.bin("baz"), is_not(existing_file()));

assert_that(p.cargo("build").cwd(p.root().join("crates/bar")),
execs().with_status(0));
assert_that(&p.bin("foo"), existing_file());
assert_that(&p.bin("bar"), existing_file());

assert_that(p.cargo("build").cwd(p.root().join("crates/baz")),
execs().with_status(0));
assert_that(&p.bin("foo"), existing_file());
assert_that(&p.bin("baz"), existing_file());

assert_that(p.cargo("build").cwd(p.root().join("crates/qux")),
execs().with_status(0));
assert_that(&p.bin("qux"), is_not(existing_file()));

assert_that(&p.root().join("Cargo.lock"), existing_file());
assert_that(&p.root().join("crates/bar/Cargo.lock"), is_not(existing_file()));
assert_that(&p.root().join("crates/baz/Cargo.lock"), is_not(existing_file()));
assert_that(&p.root().join("crates/qux/Cargo.lock"), existing_file());
}