Skip to content

Fix for #3859 #3868

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Fix for #3859 #3868

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ehiggs
Copy link
Contributor

@ehiggs ehiggs commented Mar 24, 2017

Stop ignoring .gitnore files. Add a failing test which now passes..

Stop ignoring .gitnore files. Add a failing test which now passes..
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2017

📌 Commit c21fff6 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2017

⌛ Testing commit c21fff6 with merge d4d039f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@ehiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

ehiggs commented Mar 25, 2017

Welp, it fails on my test but I'm puzzled how it works on almost every platform but one. Possibly a timing issue with flushing to disk? Or is that just a hunch from working with too many broken parallel file systems?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Hm that does seem odd, but it looks like Travis on the PR is also failing for the same reason? It looks like it may be related to a race though as the builder failing is changing?

Perhaps some more debugging information could be added to help diagnose?

@ehiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

ehiggs commented Mar 28, 2017

Sorry, I think I wasn't clear. It is failing on travis and the test that fails is the new code I added. I can't reproduce it locally on linux or OS X using eatmydata (which is a nice program which makes fsync into no-ops). But I do see failures with all the tests using templates if I just run them as ./target/debug/new-.... so maybe that's a thread to pull on.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Interesting!

In the face of #3878 I think we may want to close this though, right?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #3878) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@ehiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

ehiggs commented Mar 31, 2017

With templates pulled out until we have an RFC that's passed, this PR is no longer valid.

@ehiggs ehiggs closed this Mar 31, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants