Skip to content

Add the missing build-std update to the May goals update #1655

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
24 changes: 23 additions & 1 deletion content/Project-Goals-2025-May-Update.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -522,7 +522,29 @@ We should now be correctly deferring evaluation of type system constants making


<details>
<summary>No detailed updates available.</summary>

<!-- this comment helps to convince the markdown parser to do the right thing -->

<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/274#issuecomment-2988870822">Comment by @wesleywiser posted on 2025-06-19:</a><br>

<blockquote>

<!-- this comment helps to convince the markdown parser to do the right thing -->

- @adamgemmell and @davidtwco hosted a session on build-std at the All Hands with members from various teams discussing some of the design questions.
- We've continued our biweekly sync call with lang, compiler and cargo team members.
- @davidtwco and @adamgemmell have been hard at work preparing a compendium detailing the history of build-std and the wg-cargo-std-aware repo.
- Reviewing and editing this document is ongoing and a continuing topic of discussion for the sync call.
- In the last sync call, we discussed:
- Renewing the project goal for another cycle: enthusiastic agreement from many participants.
- Posting updates to the project goal page biweekly after each sync call.
- Discussion on the content and format of the compendium. Most of the content appears to be done but further editing and restructuring will make it clearer and more easily digestible.

<!-- this comment helps to convince the markdown parser to do the right thing -->

</blockquote>

<summary>1 detailed update available.</summary>
</details>


Expand Down