Skip to content

Fix the mess around Parity #370

@tcharding

Description

@tcharding

Recently I opened up a hornets nest by changing the parity boolean into an opaque type (#344). This PR was also flawed, @sanket1729 came to the rescue in #360 and #361.

There has now been much talk and disagreement on this, listing links here in an attempt to collect all the comments (in no particular order):

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions