Skip to content

policy: Corrected an inverted documentation for Older and After #110

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2020

Conversation

darosior
Copy link
Contributor

A small typo I noticed on docs.rs

Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
darosior added a commit to re-vault/revault_scripts that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2020
See rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript#110

Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@sanket1729 sanket1729 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utAck. Nice catch

@sanket1729 sanket1729 merged commit e98989c into rust-bitcoin:master Jul 21, 2020
@sanket1729
Copy link
Member

This was swapped in #37, but the comments are not fixed. Looks like comments here for miniscript opcodes are also incorrect

// timelocks
/// `n CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY`
After(u32),
/// `n CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY`
Older(u32),

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants