Skip to content

[Investigation] Child. Should we be able to have both active and archived (as we have now)? It seems to me that either you are active or archived. #3806

@cielf

Description

@cielf

Image

Shouldn't it only be Active OR Archived?


We should find out if any banks' partners are actively relying on a distinction between these as two separate booleans. Our current bank user group likely won't be informative here since they actively discourage / disallow specifying request by child.

Are enough users relying on this that it even is worth 'fixing'?

Edwin found that it was added in rubyforgood/partner#128 when we were still working with 2 separate apps.

It looks like archived is used for aged-out kids.

Let's see if people are using it, and for the right reason. (Back on CL)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    core teamGroomed but likely needs expert knowledgestale

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions