Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support body_name in desc block #1832

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2018

Conversation

fotos
Copy link
Contributor

@fotos fotos commented Dec 5, 2018

Adds support for body_name in desc block.

Already described in grape-swagger.

Related to #1791.

@dblock dblock merged commit 7413b7e into ruby-grape:master Dec 5, 2018
@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Dec 5, 2018

I am wondering whether some of this should be configurable or externalized or more dynamic so that future things don't need these changes? But maybe I'm overthinking it.

@fotos fotos deleted the support-body_name-in-desc-block branch December 5, 2018 14:50
@fotos
Copy link
Contributor Author

fotos commented Dec 5, 2018

I made a similar thought but then again this should be a one-off migration from the (deprecated) options hash to the block syntax. I don't know how often these options change and whether making them configurable is justified.

@LeFnord
Copy link
Member

LeFnord commented Dec 7, 2018

Hi @fotos … this deprecation stuff is in since a while, so thanks to have an eye

… can it also be done, by making it possible to overwrite desc_containe from another gem?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants